UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed: Jul 22, 2024

UPC_CFI_414/2024

METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR EFFICIENT NETWORK PROTECTION

InfringementMain Infringement ActionMannheim LDInfringementCase Closed
Parties

Claimants

  • Centripetal Limited
Reps: Ralph Nack

Respondents

  • Keysight Technologies, Inc.
Reps: Klaus Haft
Judges
  • Peter Tochtermann
  • Marije Knijff
  • Sender Tobias
  • Pascal Attali
Patents
  • EP3821580
  • EP 3 821 580 B1
  • EP 3 821 580
CPC codes: H04L63/0227, H04L63/0236, H04L63/1416, H04L63/1433, H04L63/20, H04L69/16, H04L43/028

Technology area: Telecoms · Network Security

Sector: Telecommunications

Outcome
Not infringedNot infringed
Filed: Jul 22, 2024
First decided: Dec 5, 2025
Language: English

Decision of the Mannheim Local Division dated 5 December 2025 dismissing Centripetal Limited's infringement action against Keysight Technologies entities for infringement of EP 3 821 580 (methods and systems for network protection). Centripetal alleged direct infringement of claim 16 and indirect infringement of claim 1 in Germany, Italy, France and the Netherlands. The panel found that the defendants' products (AppStack, SecureStack-SSL, Threat Simulator) did not read on the claims as construed: defendants denied in the oral hearing that the source code contained functionality for threat-metadata-based routing to a CAS (a claim requirement), and Centripetal failed to substantiate its contrary position with sufficient evidence or proof under R. 171 RoP. The conditional counterclaim for revocation was not decided as the condition (infringement finding) was not met. Centripetal was ordered to bear all costs of the infringement proceedings.

Open on UPC Registry
Claims
At issue1, 16
Not infringed1, 16
Notes: Infringement action dismissed for claims 16 (direct) and 1 (indirect) of EP 3 821 580; conditional counterclaim for revocation not decided as infringement not found.