UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 805/2025

Aug 27, 2025·EP3821580: METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR EFFICIENT NETWORK PROTECTION

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Appeal
Category
Main Appeal
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Ralph Nack (Noerr Partnerschaftsgesellschaft mbB); (MFG Patentanwälte PartG mbB)
Respondents
Reps: Klaus Haft (Hoyng Rokh Monegier); (Samson & Partner)
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
Telecommunications
Language
English
Decisions
  • 2025-09-01
    DismissedRequest for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3)

    The Court of Appeal (standing judge) dismissed Centripetal Limited's request for discretionary review (R. 220.3 RoP) of the Mannheim Local Division's refusal to permit further written pleadings (R. 36 RoP) in its infringement action against Keysight Technologies concerning EP 3 821 580. The request for review was denied because the impugned order was not manifestly wrong.

    Legal issues:Discretionary review (R. 220.3 RoP)Further exchange of written pleadings (R. 36 RoP)Manifestly wrong standard for review
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-09-01Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-09-01Not public
Order2025-09-01Public
Panel-Appointment2025-08-29Not public
Exhibit_DR_05_Appellants_Panel_Review_Request2025-08-27Not public
Exhibit_DR_04_Judge-Rapporteurs_Procedural_Order2025-08-27Not public
Exhibit_DR_02_Request_Further_Exchange_of_Written_Pleadings2025-08-27Not public
Exhibit_DR_03_Respondents_Comments_on_Appelants_Request2025-08-27Not public
20250827_Noerr_Application_for_Discretionary_Review2025-08-27Not public
Exhibit_DR_01_Proof_of_payment2025-08-27Not public
Exhibit_DR_06_Panel_Order2025-08-27Not public