UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC CoA 911/2025

20. Nov. 2025·EP2671173 · METHOD AND MEANS FOR BROWSING BY WALKING

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Case Closed (Klage abgewiesen)
Verfahrensart
Berufung
Kategorie
Hauptberufung
Parteien
Beklagte
Vertreter
Division
Court of Appeal
Technologie
  • Electrical engineering
    Telecommunications · Digital communication · Computer technology
Sprache
English
Erste Entscheidung
24. Nov. 2025
Letzte Entscheidung
24. Dez. 2025
Im Vergleich
Wie lange das Gericht bis zu einer ersten Entscheidung braucht.
Median Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung
Gesamt-UPC124
Richter Emmanuel GougéGesperrt

Vor dem UPC: Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy (29 Verfahren)·Microsoft Group (34 Verfahren)

Entscheidungen
  • 2025-12-24
    Application to leave to appeal a cost decision (RoP221)Öffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: The standing judge of the Court of Appeal (Emmanuel Gougé) dismissed Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy's application for leave to appeal the Paris Central Division's cost decision of 6 November 2025, which had ordered Suinno to pay EUR 350,000 in costs to Microsoft Corporation in connection with the infringement action UPC_CFI_164/2024 (EP 2 671 173). The CoA found the costs award reasonable and proportionate given the EUR 5,000,000 case value and EUR 600,000 ceiling, and that Suinno did not demonstrate that the first-instance court's assessment was wrong.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (4)
    • Leave to appeal a cost decision (R. 221 RoP)
    • Proportionality and reasonableness of costs award
    • Scale of ceilings for recoverable costs
    • Assessment of value of infringement action (R. 370.6 RoP)
  • 2025-11-24
    Application RoP 223Öffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: Court of Appeal dismissed Suinno's application for suspensive effect of its appeal (related to costs decisions made against Suinno by the Paris Central Division following a default decision dismissing Suinno's infringement action against Microsoft). The CoA held that Suinno had not demonstrated exceptional circumstances nor that the impugned costs decisions were manifestly erroneous.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (3)
    • Suspensive effect of appeal on costs decisions (R.223 RoP)
    • Manifest error standard
    • Enforcement of costs decisions pending appeal
DokumenttitelDatumÖffentlich
Verfahren abgeschlossen2025-12-24Nicht öffentlich
Entscheidung2025-12-24Nicht öffentlich
Final Order2025-12-24Öffentlich
Cover sheet2025-12-03Nicht öffentlich
Statement of Response2025-12-03Nicht öffentlich
Receipt2025-12-03Nicht öffentlich
Anordnung2025-11-24Nicht öffentlich
Order2025-11-24Öffentlich
Anordnung2025-11-24Nicht öffentlich
Order2025-11-24Öffentlich