UPC_CoA_911/2025

METHOD AND MEANS FOR BROWSING BY WALKING

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppealCase Closed

This case cites

Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
223.4	extreme urgency application for suspensive effect to standing judge	Binding	In cases of extreme urgency the applicant may apply at any time without formality for an order for suspensive effect to the standing judge pursuant to R. 223.4 RoP.
224.1	requirement to lodge statement of appeal before suspensive effect application	Binding	for this provision to be applicable, the applicant must first have lodged a Statement of appeal (R. 224.1 RoP) and paid the appeal fee in accordance with R. 228 RoP
228	appeal fee payment condition for suspensive effect admissibility	Binding	the applicant must first have lodged a Statement of appeal (R. 224.1 RoP) and paid the appeal fee in accordance with R. 228 RoP (Court of Appeal 15 August 2025, UPC_CoA_740/2025
221	leave to appeal cost decisions	Binding	On 19 November 2025, Suinno lodged an application for leave to appeal, pursuant to R. 221 RoP, against the impugned decision
151	application for cost decision	Binding	On 7 August 2025, Microsoft lodged an application for a cost decision, pursuant to R. 151 RoP
223	suspensive effect of appeal	Binding	Suinno asked the Court to grant suspensive effect regarding the impugned order pursuant to R. 223 RoP until the appeal has been decided.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
UPC_CoA_740/2025	admissibility conditions for standing-judge suspensive effect application — prior statement of appeal and fee payment required	Binding	Court of Appeal 15 August 2025, UPC_CoA_740/2025

Cited by

Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.