UPC Analytics
ENDE

Judge intelligence

Ruling tendencies, PI grant rate, time-to-decision per judge. French-seated divisions are anonymized at the individual level.

Alain Dumont

Court of Appeal · Munich LD · Paris LD · The Hague LD

Clear and return to cohort view
Total cases
31
PI grant rate
50%
Infringement rate
Median time-to-decision (days)
141
Roles
technically_qualified
Outcome breakdown
  • Pending15
  • Procedural only7
  • Withdrawn2
  • Revoked2
  • Costs only1
  • Injunction denied1
  • PI granted1
  • PI denied1
  • Infringed1
Roles
  • Technically Qualified Judge
  • Technically qualified judge
Recent cases
Latest filings where this judge sat on the panel.
  • APL_68523/2024Costs onlyKoninklijke Philips N.V. v Belkin Limited
  • UPC_APP_68468/2024WithdrawnAbbott Diabetes Care Inc. v Dexcom Inc.
  • UPC_APP_53031/2024Injunction deniedKoninklijke Philips N.V. v Belkin Limited
  • UPC_APP_68465/2024WithdrawnAbbott Diabetes Care Inc. v Dexcom Inc.
  • ACT_547520/2023RevokedDexcom Inc. v Abbott Laboratories
  • 2026-01-20UPC_CFI_214/2026Microsoft Corporation v BF exaQC AG
  • 2025-07-04UPC_CFI_624/2025PI grantedAbbott Diabetes Care Inc. v Sinocare Inc.
  • 2025-07-02UPC_CFI_603/2025Koninklijke Philips N.V. v Belkin International, Inc.
  • 2025-06-27UPC_CFI_587/2025PI deniedAbbott Diabetes Care Inc. v Sinocare Inc.
  • 2025-06-03UPC_CFI_492/2025Procedural onlyPAPST LICENSING GmbH & Co. KG v Beijing Roborock Technology Co., Ltd.
  • 2025-06-03UPC_CFI_491/2025PAPST LICENSING GmbH & Co. KG v Ecovacs Home Service Robotics Co.,Ltd.
  • 2025-06-03UPC_CFI_1971/2025ECOVACS Europe GmbH v PAPST LICENSING GmbH & Co. KG
  • 2025-03-07UPC_CFI_180/2025BF exaQC AG v NVIDIA Corporation
  • 2025-01-10UPC_CoA_19/2025Procedural onlyKoninklijke Philips N.V. v Belkin GmbH
  • 2025-01-02UPC_CoA_845/2024Procedural onlyKoninklijke Philips N.V. v Belkin GmbH
  • 2024-11-18UPC_APP_61565/2024Berggren Oy v Dexcom Inc.
  • 2024-11-11UPC_CoA_683/2024Procedural onlyKoninklijke Philips N.V. v Belkin GmbH
  • 2024-09-23UPC_CoA_549/2024Name not displayed for GDPR reasons. Represented by Philipp CEPL v Koninklijke Philips N.V.
  • 2024-09-20UPC_CoA_534/2024InfringedKoninklijke Philips N.V. v Belkin GmbH
  • 2024-09-02UPC_APP_49196/2024Abbott Laboratories v Dexcom Inc.
  • 2024-08-05UPC_APP_45331/2024Abbott Laboratories v Dexcom Inc.
  • 2024-04-15CC_20188/2024Dexcom International Limited v Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.
  • 2024-03-15CC_14065/2024Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. v Dexcom Inc.
  • 2024-03-14CC_13509/2024Dexcom Inc. v Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.
  • 2023-11-14UPC_CFI_425/2023Procedural onlyAbbott Diabetes Care Inc. v Dexcom Inc.