Judge intelligence
Ruling tendencies, PI grant rate, time-to-decision per judge. French-seated divisions are anonymized at the individual level.
Alain Dumont
Court of Appeal · Munich LD · Paris LD · The Hague LD
Total cases
31
PI grant rate
50%
Infringement rate
—
Median time-to-decision (days)
141
Roles
technically_qualified
Outcome breakdown
- Pending15
- Procedural only7
- Withdrawn2
- Revoked2
- Costs only1
- Injunction denied1
- PI granted1
- PI denied1
- Infringed1
Roles
- Technically Qualified Judge
- Technically qualified judge
Recent cases
Latest filings where this judge sat on the panel.
- —APL_68523/2024Court of AppealCosts onlyKoninklijke Philips N.V. v Belkin Limited
- —UPC_APP_68468/2024The Hague LDWithdrawnAbbott Diabetes Care Inc. v Dexcom Inc.
- —UPC_APP_53031/2024Court of AppealInjunction deniedKoninklijke Philips N.V. v Belkin Limited
- —UPC_APP_68465/2024The Hague LDWithdrawnAbbott Diabetes Care Inc. v Dexcom Inc.
- —ACT_547520/2023Munich LDRevokedDexcom Inc. v Abbott Laboratories
- 2026-01-20UPC_CFI_214/2026Munich LD—Microsoft Corporation v BF exaQC AG
- 2025-07-04UPC_CFI_624/2025The Hague LDPI grantedAbbott Diabetes Care Inc. v Sinocare Inc.
- 2025-07-02UPC_CFI_603/2025Court of Appeal—Koninklijke Philips N.V. v Belkin International, Inc.
- 2025-06-27UPC_CFI_587/2025The Hague LDPI deniedAbbott Diabetes Care Inc. v Sinocare Inc.
- 2025-06-03UPC_CFI_492/2025Munich LDProcedural onlyPAPST LICENSING GmbH & Co. KG v Beijing Roborock Technology Co., Ltd.
- 2025-06-03UPC_CFI_491/2025Munich LD—PAPST LICENSING GmbH & Co. KG v Ecovacs Home Service Robotics Co.,Ltd.
- 2025-06-03UPC_CFI_1971/2025Munich LD—ECOVACS Europe GmbH v PAPST LICENSING GmbH & Co. KG
- 2025-03-07UPC_CFI_180/2025Munich LD—BF exaQC AG v NVIDIA Corporation
- 2025-01-10UPC_CoA_19/2025Court of AppealProcedural onlyKoninklijke Philips N.V. v Belkin GmbH
- 2025-01-02UPC_CoA_845/2024Court of AppealProcedural onlyKoninklijke Philips N.V. v Belkin GmbH
- 2024-11-18UPC_APP_61565/2024Munich LD—Berggren Oy v Dexcom Inc.
- 2024-11-11UPC_CoA_683/2024Court of AppealProcedural onlyKoninklijke Philips N.V. v Belkin GmbH
- 2024-09-23UPC_CoA_549/2024Court of Appeal—Name not displayed for GDPR reasons. Represented by Philipp CEPL v Koninklijke Philips N.V.
- 2024-09-20UPC_CoA_534/2024Court of AppealInfringedKoninklijke Philips N.V. v Belkin GmbH
- 2024-09-02UPC_APP_49196/2024Munich LD—Abbott Laboratories v Dexcom Inc.
- 2024-08-05UPC_APP_45331/2024Paris LD—Abbott Laboratories v Dexcom Inc.
- 2024-04-15CC_20188/2024Paris LD—Dexcom International Limited v Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.
- 2024-03-15CC_14065/2024Paris LD—Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. v Dexcom Inc.
- 2024-03-14CC_13509/2024The Hague LD—Dexcom Inc. v Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.
- 2023-11-14UPC_CFI_425/2023Paris LDProcedural onlyAbbott Diabetes Care Inc. v Dexcom Inc.