UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics20Cases12Decisions19Judges61Parties9Firms

Judge intelligence

Ruling tendencies, PI grant rate, time-to-decision per judge. French-seated divisions are anonymized at the individual level.

CategoryrevocationClear all

Andrea Postiglione

Dusseldorf LD · Milan CD · Munich LD

Clear and return to cohort view
Total cases
50
PI grant rate
—
Infringement rate
100%
Median time-to-decision (days)
65
Roles
presiding, rapporteur, standing
Outcome breakdown
  • Pending17
  • Procedural only12
  • Withdrawn5
  • Costs only5
  • Infringed3
  • Dismissed3
  • Settled1
  • Permanent injunction1
  • Patent maintained1
  • Patent amended1
  • PI denied1
Roles
  • Duty judge
  • Judge-Rapporteur
  • Presiding Judge
  • Presiding Judge / Judge-Rapporteur
  • Presiding Judge and Judge-Rapporteur
  • Presiding judge
  • Presiding judge / Judge-rapporteur
  • Presiding judge and judge-rapporteur
Recent cases
Latest filings where this judge sat on the panel.
  • —UPC_APP_17607/2025WithdrawnPfizer, Inc. v GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA
  • —CC_54050/2024Procedural onlyLabrador Diagnostics LLC v bioMérieux SA
  • —ACT_48305/2024Procedural onlybioMérieux UK Limited v Labrador Diagnostics LLC
  • —UPC_APP_50666/2024Procedural onlyInsulet Corporation v EOFLOW Co., Ltd.
  • —CC_65201/2024InfringedInsulet Corporation v EOFLOW Co., Ltd.
  • —UPC_APP_16366/2025WithdrawnPfizer, Inc. v GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA
  • —ORD_22456/2025InfringedInsulet Corporation v EOFLOW Co., Ltd.
  • —UPC_APP_17784/2025WithdrawnPfizer, Inc. v GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA
  • —UPC_APP_5366/2025Costs onlyInsulet Corporation v EOFLOW Co., Ltd.
  • —ORD_52068/2024Procedural onlyInsulet Corporation v EOFLOW Co., Ltd.
  • —UPC_APP_5729/2025WithdrawnSharkNinja Italy S.R.L. v Dyson Technology Limited
  • —UPC_APP_32529/2025DismissedBodycap v EPO (Office européen des brevets)
  • —UPC_CFI_57/2024SettledSharkNinja Italy S.R.L. v Dyson Technology Limited
  • —ACT_56003/2024InfringedInsulet Corporation v EOFLOW Co., Ltd.
  • —ORD_17811/2025Permanent injunctionMaschio Gaspardo S.p.A. v Spiridonakis Bros GP
  • 2026-01-28UPC_CFI_292/2026—Light Guide Optics International v biolitec Holding GmbH & Co. KG
  • 2025-11-24UPC_CFI_498/2025—Crystal Clear Codec Sp.z o.o. v Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd.
  • 2025-11-14UPC_CFI_1587/2025—BIOGARAN v H. Lundbeck A/S
  • 2025-11-14UPC_CFI_1576/2025—Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd. v Innovative Sonic Corporation
  • 2025-10-14UPC_CFI_1167/2025Procedural onlyInsulet Corporation v EOFLOW Co., Ltd.
  • 2025-09-26UPC_CFI_941/2025Procedural onlyHerbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP v EOFLOW Co., Ltd.
  • 2025-09-25UPC_CFI_927/2025Procedural onlyLa Siddhi Consultancy Limited v Athena Pharmaceutiques SAS
  • 2025-09-15UPC_CFI_860/2025—LS 9 GmbH v bellissa HAAS GmbH
  • 2025-09-15UPC_CFI_871/2025—RiVOLUTiON GmbH v Cilag GmbH International
  • 2025-08-21UPC_CFI_773/2025—Insulet Corporation v EOFLOW Co., Ltd.