UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions3Judges2Parties2Firms

Judge intelligence

Ruling tendencies, PI grant rate, time-to-decision per judge. French-seated divisions are anonymized at the individual level.

Legal principlefront-loaded procedure and inadmissibility of new grounds not responsive to defenceClear all

Ulrike Keltsch

Hamburg LD · Paris CD

Clear and return to cohort view
Total cases
9
PI grant rate
—
Infringement rate
—
Median time-to-decision (days)
193
Roles
technically_qualified
Outcome breakdown
  • Procedural only6
  • Pending2
  • Patent amended1
Roles
  • Technically Qualified Judge
Recent cases
Latest filings where this judge sat on the panel.
  • —ACT_555899/2023Patent amendedBITZER Electronics A/S v Carrier Corporation
  • —UPC_APP_20743/2024Procedural onlyCarrier Corporation v BITZER Electronics A/S
  • 2025-03-14UPC_CFI_215/2025—Nintendo Co., Ltd. v Malikie Innovations Ltd.
  • 2025-03-14UPC_CFI_214/2025—Nintendo Co., Ltd. v Malikie Innovations Ltd.
  • 2024-09-25UPC_CFI_555/2024Procedural onlyMalikie Innovations Ltd. v Nintendo of Europe SE
  • 2024-09-23UPC_CFI_537/2024Procedural onlyMalikie Innovations Ltd. v Nintendo of Europe SE
  • 2024-06-18UPC_APP_35673/2024Procedural onlyMathys & Squire LLP v BITZER Electronics A/S
  • 2024-02-06UPC_APP_6758/2024Procedural onlyName not displayed for GDPR reasons. Represented by Lionel MARTIN v BITZER Electronics A/S
  • 2023-06-29UPC_CFI_263/2023Procedural onlyBITZER Electronics A/S v Carrier Corporation