Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Filtering to principle: Late-filed arguments at oral hearing excluded under R. 9.2 RoP

Most-litigated legal principles

Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.

Principle	Cases	Decided	Patentee success
mathematical identity of results does not establish infringement; actual method configuration is decisive	1	1	0%
late-filed arguments at oral hearing excluded under r. 9.2 rop	1	1	0%
indirect infringement requires showing the product is suitable and intended for the patented use	1	1	0%
claim scope limited by the patent's own description disclosing insufficiently stable reference genes as non-qualifying	1	1	0%

Most-rejected arguments

Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.

Argument	Party	Cases
accused test kits directly infringe claim 1 because the average normalization is mathematically identical to successive per-gene normalization	Claimant	1
indirect infringement: the test kit is suitable and intended for the patented method using oaz1 alone as reference gene	Claimant	1
genes calm2 and rpl37a can serve as further reference genes under the patent's multi-reference-gene reading	Claimant	1

Most-cited prior art

References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.