Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Filtering to principle: eu authorized representative as intermediary under art. 63(1) upca

Most-litigated legal principles

Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.

Principle	Cases	Decided	Patentee success
upc jurisdiction regardless of defendant's domicile (art. 71b(2) upca)	1	1	100%
anchor defendant and close connection under art. 8(1) brussels i recast	1	1	100%
eu authorized representative as intermediary under art. 63(1) upca	1	1	100%
eu authorized representative as anchor defendant in patent infringement proceedings	1	1	100%
plausible allegation of infringing acts required for national part jurisdiction	1	1	100%
no enforcement security required where applicant is a well-known manufacturer	1	1	100%

Most-rejected arguments

Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.

Argument	Party	Cases
application for provisional measures as to remaining embodiments (second group of attacked products)	Claimant	1
international jurisdiction for spanish national part of defendant 4 (dreame technology ab)	Claimant	1

Most-cited prior art

References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.