UPClytics
English
Sign inSign up
Analytics2,692Cases1,785Decisions257Judges1,851Parties459Firms

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principlerecurring licensing revenues from an NPE can negate insolvency risk for security-for-costs purposesClear all

Filtering to principle: recurring licensing revenues from an NPE can negate insolvency risk for security-for-costs purposes

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
security for costs dismissed where defendant fails to evidence that enforcement against us-based claimant would be unduly burdensome110%
recurring licensing revenues from an npe can negate insolvency risk for security-for-costs purposes110%
mere status as npe insufficient to justify security for costs110%
withdrawal of infringement action permissible before appeal period expires where parties consent and have no legitimate interest in appeal (coa_569/2014 applied)110%
decision on infringement action including costs becomes ineffective upon permitted withdrawal under r. 265 rop110%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
samsung should be ordered to provide security for costs against headwaterRespondent1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.