Overview · Filed: —
ORD_17811/2025
REVERSIBLE TOOL FOR AGRICULTURAL SUBSOILERS AND THE LIKE
Procedural & sub-applicationsDefault JudgmentsMilan CDDecision By Default—
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
Rules of Procedure · 3
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 355.2 | procedural | Binding | notes: Before issuing a decision by default when the defendant did not even enter proceedings, factors other than the lack of opposition must be considered. Rule 355.2 RoP has a broader scope than Rule 171.2 RoP and must be interpreted in light o |
| 171.2 | procedural | Binding | ault when the defendant did not even enter proceedings, factors other than the lack of opposition must be considered. Rule 355.2 RoP has a broader scope than Rule 171.2 RoP and must be interpreted in light of the front-loaded nature of UPC proceed |
| 355(1) | infringement | Binding | uct. The requests of the claimant in the statute of infringement Maschio Gaspardo requests that the Central Division of Milan issue a decision by default per R. 355(1) RoP where the Defendant fails to file written submissions within the relevant t |
courtName.other · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 | procedural | Binding | gal relief sought. The claimant must therefore provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate to be entitled to the relief sought (page 13). The requirements of Art. 26 UPCA regarding the so-called “double territoriality” are satisfied when the offer |
| 63(1) | infringement | Binding | missions within the relevant time limit (R. 355(1)(a) RoP) or fails to appear at the oral hearing (R. 355(1)(b) RoP) and: 1) grant a permanent injunction by Article 63(1) UPCA to prohibit the continuation of direct and/or indirect infringement of |
UPC (CFI) · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CFI_513/2024 | procedural | Binding | [FIRST PAGES] 1 Milan - Central Division - First Instance - central division UPC_CFI_513/2024 Decision by Default of the Court of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court delivered on 08 July 2025 Headnotes: Before issuing a decision |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.