UPC_APP_68658/2024

METHOD OF TREATING PROLIFERATIVE DISORDERS AND OTHER PATHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS MEDIATED BY BCR-ABL, C-KIT, DDR1, DDR2 OR PDGF-R KINASE ACTIVITY

Procedural & sub-applicationsDocument Access (RoP262)Milan CDGenericCase Closed

This case cites

Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
RoP_rule_262	public access to court documents	Binding	An application under Rule 262.1 b) has to be read only in regard to the documents filed in the main proceedings at the date the application was made
RoP_rule_4	electronic filing / digital signature	Binding	Rule 4.1 RoP does not preclude the lodging by a legal representative of a non-digitally signed submission when this document or a written pleading also in the light of its electronic filing is unequivocally referable to the lawyer who lodged it.
RoP_rule_264	hearing by written submissions or videoconferencing	Binding	Whenever a party is to be heard under Rule 264 RoP, the choice of replacing the personal attendance by the filing of written submissions or by videoconferencing provided for in the same rule should not be exercised as to result detrimental to the parties' power

Cited by

Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.