Overview · Filed: May 3, 2024
UPC_CFI_195/2024
BROWN MUSHROOMS FOR COMMERCIAL PRODUCTION
Provisional measuresProvisional MeasuresThe Hague LDProvisional measuresCase Closed
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
EPC article · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Art. 53 EPC | patentability; exclusion of biological material from patentability | Binding | Mushroom strain is not considered to be excluded from patentability (Article 53(b) EPC. Infringement. Measures granted. |
| Art. 63 UPCA | provisional measures; injunction | Binding | to order an injunction against the defendant, effective as of the day of service on the defendant, to refrain from infringing EP 1 993 350 B2 in any way in the territories of The Netherlands, Germany, France and Italy (art. 63(1) UPCA |
Rules of Procedure · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| RoP_rule 211 | provisional measures; injunction | Binding | to refrain from infringing EP 1 993 350 B2 in any way in the territories of The Netherlands, Germany, France and Italy (art. 63(1) UPCA and R. 211(1)(a) RoP) |
| RoP_rule 211 | security for enforcement of provisional measures | Binding | The request of the Defendant pursuant to Rule 211.5 RoP to make the granting of provisional measures dependent on the provision of a security by Amycel for the enforcement of EUR 200,000.00 is granted |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
| Cited in | Date | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CFI_486/2024 Dusseldorf LD | Sep 5, 2024 | urgency — necessity assessment in provisional measures | Distinguished | Sofern die Antragstellerin auf die Entscheidung der Lokalkammer in Den Haag vom 31. Juli 2024 (Anlage CBH 51, 51a) verweist, ist aus dem angeführten Abschnitt nicht ersichtlich, dass die Lokalkammer die sachliche Notwendigkeit nach den oben genannten, inhaltlichen Kriterien überhaupt geprüft hat. |