UPC_CFI_315/2024

MODULAR POINT-OF-CARE DEVICES AND USES THEREOF

InfringementMain Infringement ActionDusseldorf LDInfringementCase Closed

This case cites

Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
108	jurisdiction — summons to oral hearing	Binding	SUBJECT OF THE PROCEEDINGS: R. 108 RoP- Summons to the oral hearing
8.2	jurisdiction — representation requirement at oral hearing	Background	It is hereby ordered that the parties, who will be represented by representatives (R. 8.2, 108 RoP), be summoned to the oral hearing
209.1	jurisdiction — oral hearing procedure	Background	It is hereby ordered that the parties, who will be represented by representatives (R. 8.2, 108 RoP), be summoned to the oral hearing (R. 209.1 (b) RoP)
109	language regime — simultaneous interpretation	Background	Under the conditions laid down in R. 109 RoP, the parties are entitled to request simultaneous interpretation.
115	jurisdiction — public/audio recording of oral hearing	Background	The oral hearing shall be open to the public unless the Court decides to make it, to the extent necessary, confidential ... (R. 115 RoP).
118.5	costs — ceiling based on value in dispute	Binding	According to Art. 69(1) UPCA in conjunction with R. 118.5 RoP, a decision on costs has to be made.
152.2	costs — Administrative Committee table	Binding	the table adopted by the Administrative Committee on April 24, 2023, on the basis of R. 152.2 RoP, which neither party has objected to in the oral hearing, the maximum limit for reimbursable costs is determined at € 600,000.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
25(b)	infringement — offering for use of method by third parties	Binding	The offering for use mentioned in Art. 25 (b) UPCA aims at the offering of the process implemented by third parties for who the Defendants need to sign responsibility.
69(1)	costs — costs to be borne by unsuccessful party	Binding	According to Art. 69(1) UPCA in conjunction with R. 118.5 RoP, a decision on costs has to be made.

Cited by

Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.