Overview · Filed: Oct 17, 2023
UPC_CFI_365/2023
PLANOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATE ORIGINAL PLATE, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING PLANOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATE, AND PLANOGRAPHIC PRINTING METHOD
InfringementMain Infringement ActionMannheim LDInfringementCase Closed
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
Rules of Procedure · 6
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24(g) | claim construction | Binding | in the context of a prior use right, the according facts have to be presented in the Statement of Defense and the Counterclaim for Revocation. It is in those briefs that the defendant has to submit reasons why the action shall fail, R. 24(g) RoP |
| 25.1 | added matter | Binding | the grounds for revocation have to be presented comprehensively, R. 25(1)(b) and (c) RoP whereas the following briefs have to limit themselves to a response to matters raised in the Reply, R. 29(c) and (d) RoP |
| 29 | claim construction | Binding | the following briefs have to limit themselves to a response to matters raised in the Reply, R. 29(c) and (d) RoP |
| 302.1 | jurisdiction | Binding | The order is based on R. 302.1, R. 303.2, R. 340.2 RoP applied accordingly |
| 303.2 | jurisdiction | Binding | The order is based on R. 302.1, R. 303.2, R. 340.2 RoP applied accordingly |
| 340.2 | jurisdiction | Binding | The order is based on R. 302.1, R. 303.2, R. 340.2 RoP applied accordingly |
UPC Court of Appeal · 6
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CoA_699/2025 | jurisdiction | Binding | after the Court of Appeal decided upon and in part upheld the 1st enforcement order of 23 July 2025 (CoA Order of 14 October 2025, UPC_CoA_699/2025) |
| UPC_CoA_845/2024 | jurisdiction | Persuasive | CoA UPC_CoA_845/2024, APL_68523/2024, UPC_CoA_50/2025, APL_3697/2025, Order of 30 May 2025 - Belkin v. Philips |
| UPC_CoA_50/2025 | jurisdiction | Persuasive | CoA UPC_CoA_845/2024, APL_68523/2024, UPC_CoA_50/2025, APL_3697/2025, Order of 30 May 2025 - Belkin v. Philips |
| UPC_CoA_699/2025 | jurisdiction | Binding | after the Court of Appeal decided upon and in part upheld the 1st enforcement order of 23 July 2025 (CoA Order of 14 October 2025, UPC_CoA_699/2025) |
| UPC_CoA_845/2024 | jurisdiction | Persuasive | CoA UPC_CoA_845/2024, APL_68523/2024, UPC_CoA_50/2025, APL_3697/2025, Order of 30 May 2025 - Belkin v. Philips |
| UPC_CoA_50/2025 | jurisdiction | Persuasive | CoA UPC_CoA_845/2024, APL_68523/2024, UPC_CoA_50/2025, APL_3697/2025, Order of 30 May 2025 - Belkin v. Philips |
Court of Justice EU · 4
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| C-339/22 | jurisdiction | Binding | No final decision has been delivered in Case C-339/22 (BSH Hausgerate) by the ECJ to date. The panel is inclined to deal with the questions concerned in a separate proceeding after the separation of cases |
| C-339/22 | jurisdiction | Binding | The decision of the European Court of Justice in re C-339/22 (BSH Hausgerate) had not been delivered until the end of the oral hearing but only thereafter on 25 February 2025 |
| Art. 71a Brussels Ia Reg. | jurisdiction | Binding | concerning the international jurisdiction under the Brussels Ia Regulation to be applied by the UPC pursuant Art. 71a, Art. 71b (1) Brussels Ia Reg. |
| Art. 71b(1) Brussels Ia Reg. | jurisdiction | Binding | pursuant Art. 71a, Art. 71b (1) Brussels Ia Reg. |
EPC article · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28 | claim construction | Binding | Where German Law is applicable upon a private prior use right according to Art. 28 UPCA, it is necessary that a firm and final decision to use the form of alleged prior use took place before the priority date |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.