UPClytics
Overview · Filed: Jul 22, 2024

UPC_CFI_414/2024

METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR EFFICIENT NETWORK PROTECTION

InfringementMain Infringement ActionMannheim LDInfringementCase Closed
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Rules of Procedure · 5

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
171infringement by equivalents — burden of substantiationBindingit would have been upon Claimant to substantiate in more detail, why it is of the opinion, that this is not true or relevant and point to specific facts (R. 171 RoP)
30.1claim amendment — conditional counterclaim allowable under procedural rulesBackgroundsuch condition, which depends on internal procedural circumstances, is allowable under the Rules of Procedure, to which internal procedural conditions, which depend on the assessment of a particular question by the court, are not unknown (see e.g. R. 30.1.c, 118.2.a RoP).
118.2claim amendment — conditional procedural actsBackgroundsuch condition, which depends on internal procedural circumstances, is allowable under the Rules of Procedure ... (see e.g. R. 30.1.c, 118.2.a RoP).
263claim amendment — withdrawal/amendment of caseBackgroundIt can be left open, whether this situation falls within the ambit of R. 263 RoP or R. 265 RoP.
265claim amendment — withdrawal of counterclaimBackgroundIt can be left open, whether this situation falls within the ambit of R. 263 RoP or R. 265 RoP. If regarded as a withdrawal according to R. 265.1 RoP, there is no legitimate interest of Claimant
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
Cited inDateLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
UPC_CFI_681/2024

Munich LD

Dec 19, 2025conditional counterclaim — admissibility of intra-procedural conditionPersuasivefor the admissibility of such an intra-procedural condition, see also LD Mannheim, decision of 5 December 2025, UPC_CFI_414/2024
UPC_CFI_628/2024

Munich LD

Jan 13, 2026conditional counterclaim — admissibility of intra-procedural conditionPersuasivefor the admissibility of such an intra-procedural condition, see also LD Mannheim, decision of 5 December 2025, UPC_CFI_414/2024