Overview · Filed: Jun 20, 2025
UPC_CFI_559/2025
SOLAR CELL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
InfringementMain Infringement ActionMunich LDInfringementCase ClosedSettled at: Pre-merits
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
Rules of Procedure · 11
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 265.1 | withdrawal of action | Binding | Pursuant to Rule 265.1, first sentence, RoP, a claimant may, as long as there is no final decision in the action, request that the action be withdrawn. |
| 265.2 | consequence of permitted withdrawal | Binding | The consequence of permitting a withdrawal is, according to Rule 265.2 (a) and (b) RoP |
| 370.9 | 60% court fee reimbursement on withdrawal | Binding | Court fees shall be partially refunded to the Claimant in a rate of 60% in accordance with R. 370.9 lit. (b) (i) or (c) (i), (d) RoP |
| 295 | stay of proceedings pending settlement negotiations | Binding | the Judge-rapporteur suspended the proceedings pursuant to Rule 295 (d) RoP due to settlement negotiations |
| 295 | stay of proceedings regarding unrepresented defendant | Binding | The suspension of proceedings regarding Defendant 5) is based on Rule 295(m) RoP. |
| 152 | no cost decision on representation | Binding | No decision shall be made on the costs of representation (R. 152 RoP) |
| 295 | stay of proceedings pending settlement negotiations | Binding | Due to the ongoing settlement negotiations and the joint application of the Claimant and Defendants 1) to 4), the proceedings are stayed under Rule 295(d) RoP. |
| 295 | stay regarding unrepresented/uncontactable defendant | Binding | The suspension of proceedings regarding Defendant 5) is based on Rule 295(m) RoP. |
| 19.1 | one-month deadline for preliminary objection runs afresh on resumption | Binding | the full one-month deadline for a Preliminary objection pursuant Rule 19.1 RoP runs afresh |
| 23 | extension of deadline for statement of defence | Binding | by the way of extension of the deadline pursuant Rule 23 RoP, a full five-month deadline for the Statement of defence ... runs afresh |
| 296.3 | effect of suspension on time limits | Binding | The effect of suspending the proceedings on time limits is set out in Rule 296.3 RoP. Accordingly, the time limits begin to run afresh for the pu |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.