Overview · Filed: Oct 28, 2024
UPC_CFI_627/2024
A COMPUTER CLUSTER ARRANGEMENT FOR PROCESSING A COMPUTATION TASK AND METHOD FOR OPERATION THEREOF
InfringementMain Infringement ActionMunich LDInfringementCase Closed
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
Rules of Procedure · 4
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 323 | language regime — application to change language of proceedings | Binding | Nvidia Corporation and Nvidia GmbH, referring to R. 323 RoP, requested that the language of proceedings be changed from German to English |
| 323.1 | language regime — forwarding application to President of CFI | Background | The Application was forwarded to the President of the Court of First Instance of the UPC pursuant to R. 323.1. RoP. |
| 323.2 | language regime — claimant invited to state position on language change application | Background | By an order dated 12 December 2024, the Claimant in the main action was subsequently invited, in accordance with R. 323.2 RoP, to state its position on the admissibility of the Application |
| 323.3 | language regime — panel consulted | Background | The panel of the LD Munich has been consulted in accordance with R. 323.3 RoP. |
EPC article · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 49(5) | language regime — change of language of proceedings to language of patent for fairness | Binding | Change of the language of the proceedings – Art. 49 (5) UPCA and R. 323 RoP |
UPC Court of Appeal · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CoA_207/2024 | language regime — domicile of parties in country of chosen language is important factor | Binding | The fact that the parties are domiciled in countries where the language of the proceedings chosen by the claimant is an official language was considered by the Court of Appeal to be an important factor in deciding on an application to use the language of the patent as the language of the proceedings (UPC_CoA_207/2024 - APL 24598/2024 – Order dated 5 September 2024). |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.