UPClytics
Overview · Filed: Mar 31, 2025

UPC_CoA_300/2025

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealGenericCase Closed
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

courtName.other · 4

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
Rule 12.1(a) EPLC Rulesno de facto continuity between accredited course and transitional qualification courseBindingThere is no de facto continuity between an accredited course and a course mentioned in Rule 12.1 EPLC Rules.
Article 48(2)representative qualification requirementsBindingPursuant to Article 48(2) UPCA, parties may be represented by European Patent Attorneys who are entitled to act as professional representatives before the European Patent Office pursuant to Article 134 of the EPC and who have the necessary qualifi...
Rule 1 EPLC Rulesaccredited course requirementBackgroundthe course (accredited under Rule 1 EPLC Rules in November 2023 by decision of the Administrative Committee of the UPC, Ref: D-AC/07/24112023)
Rule 3 EPLC Rulesrequirements for EPLC certificateBackgroundit satisfies the requirements of Rule 3 EPLC Rules, given that the course (accredited under Rule 1 EPLC Rules in November 2023 by decision of the Administrative Committee of the UPC, Ref: D-AC/07/24112023) is substantially (if not formally) the same

EPC article · 1

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
134European patent attorney entitlement to act before EPOBackgroundparties may be represented by European Patent Attorneys who are entitled to act as professional representatives before the European Patent Office pursuant to Article 134 of the EPC

Rules of Procedure · 1

TargetLegal pointStrengthExcerpt
286.2demonstrating qualifications by submitting certificatesBindingIn accordance with Rule 286.2 of the Rules of Procedure of the Unified Patent Court (hereinafter: Rules of Procedure), these requirements must be demonstrated by submitting the relevant certificates.
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.