Overview · Filed: Sep 13, 2023
UPC_CoA_320/2023
AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppealCase Closed
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
Rules of Procedure · 12
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 271 | valid service of statement of claim without annexes | Binding | Nach Regel 271 VerfO kann eine Klageschrift, auch wenn in ihr auf Anlagen Bezug genommen oder deren spätere Vorlage angekündigt wird, dem Beklagten wirksam zugestellt werden |
| 13 | simultaneous upload of annexes with statement of claim | Binding | wenn ein Kläger die Anlagen nicht gleichzeitig mit der Klageschrift in das CMS hochgeladen hat und damit Regel 13.2 VerfO nicht eingehalten hat |
| 19 | term extension for preliminary objection and statement of defence | Binding | sind die in den Regeln 19.1 und 23 VerfO genannten Fristen um den Zeitraum zu verlängern, in dem die Anlagen entgegen Regel 13.2 VerfO nicht zur Verfügung standen. |
| 16 | Registry duty to check compliance with formal requirements | Binding | Nach Regel 16.2 VerfO ist die Kanzlei verpflichtet, die Einhaltung (unter anderem) von Regel 13.2 VerfO zu überprüfen. |
| 16 | rejection of action for non-compliance | Binding | Pursuant to Rule 16.5 RoP, if a claimant fails to correct the deficiencies found by the Registry (including non-compliance with Rule 13.2 RoP), a judge of the division may reject the action as inadmissible. |
| 9 | disregarding documents filed outside time limit | Binding | Under Rule 9.2, the court may also disregard documents that have not been submitted within the applicable time limit. |
| 271 | valid service of statement of claim without annexes | Binding | Under Rule 271 RoP, a Statement of claim, even if it refers to or announces the later submission of Annexes, can be validly served on a defendant |
| 13 | simultaneous upload of annexes with statement of claim | Binding | if a claimant did not upload the Annexes simultaneously with the Statement of claim in the CMS, and thus did not comply with Rule 13.2, and as a consequence these have not been available |
| 19 | term extension for preliminary objection and statement of defence | Binding | this in itself is sufficient to constitute a reasoned request by a defendant for an extension of the terms mentioned in Rules 19.1 and 23 RoP for lodging a Preliminary objection and the Statement of defense |
| 16 | Registry duty to check compliance with formal requirements | Binding | Rule 16.2 RoP imposes the duty to verify the compliance with (amongst others) Rule 13.2 RoP on the Registry. |
| 16 | rejection of action for non-compliance | Binding | Pursuant to Rule 16.5 RoP, if a claimant fails to correct the deficiencies found by the Registry (including non-compliance with Rule 13.2 RoP), a judge of the division may reject the action as inadmissible. |
| 9 | disregarding documents filed outside time limit | Binding | Under Rule 9.2, the court may also disregard documents that have not been submitted within the applicable time limit. |
UPC (CFI) · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CFI_14/2023 | impugned procedural order on term extension | Distinguished | Die LKM hat daher zu Unrecht und entgegen der Systematik der Verfahrensordnung die von den Berufungsklägerinnen beantragte Fristverlängerung … für nicht gerechtfertigt gehalten |
| UPC_CFI_14/2023 | impugned procedural order on term extension | Distinguished | In these proceedings, the appellants (Sanofi) appeal against the procedural order under number ORD_566193/2023 (PO) of the Munich local division (MLD) of 29 August 2023. |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.