Overview · Filed: Jan 19, 2026
UPC_CoA_8/2026
SECURITY MODULE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AND MONITORING THE DATA TRAFFIC OF A PERSONAL COMPUTER
AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealGenericCase Closed
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
courtName.other · 9
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Article 3(1) Regulation 1257/2012 | jurisdiction | Binding | Die Abteilung verwies auf Artikel 3 (1) der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1257/2012 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 17. Dezember 2012 |
| Council Decision 2011/167/EU | jurisdiction | Binding | Mit dem Beschluss 2011/167/EU des Rates vom 10. März 2011 wurde eine verstärkte Zusammenarbeit im Bereich der Schaffung eines einheitlichen Patentschutzes genehmigt. |
| Article 267 TFEU | jurisdiction | Binding | grundsätzlich verpflichtet, den Gerichtshof gemäß Art. 267 Abs. 3 AEUV anzurufen |
| Article 9(3) Regulation 1257/2012 | jurisdiction | Binding | Gemäß Artikel 9 Absatz 3 der Verordnung Nr. 1257/2012 sorgen die teilnehmenden Mitgliedstaaten für einen wirksamen Rechtsschutz |
| Article 3(1) Regulation 1257/2012 | jurisdiction | Binding | Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2012 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection |
| Council Decision 2011/167/EU | jurisdiction | Binding | Council Decision 2011/167/EU of 10 March 2011 authorised enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection. |
| Article 267 TFEU | jurisdiction | Binding | that court or tribunal is in principle obliged to make a reference to the Court of Justice within the meaning of the third indent of Article 267 TFEU |
| Article 3(2) Regulation 1257/2012 | jurisdiction | Binding | KEYWORDS: Registration of unitary effect - Article 3(2) of Regulation 1257/2012 |
| Article 6(3) TEU | jurisdiction | Binding | Pursuant to Art. 6(3) TEU, fundamental rights, as guaranteed by the ECHR and as they result from the constitutional traditions common to the Member States |
Court of Justice EU · 5
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| C-561/19 | jurisdiction | Binding | Urteil vom 6. Oktober 2021, Consorzio Italian Management e Catania Multiservizi, C-561/19, EU:C:2021:799, Rn. 32–59 |
| C-274/11 | jurisdiction | Binding | Urteil vom 16. April 2013, Spanien und Italien gegen Rat, C-274/11, EU:C:2013:240, Rn. 92 |
| C-65/23 | jurisdiction | Binding | Urteil vom 19. Dezember 2024, K GmbH [Traitement de données personnelles des employés], C-65/23, EU:C:2024:1051, Rn. 53 |
| C-561/19 | jurisdiction | Binding | see, for example, judgment of 6 October 2021, Consorzio Italian Management e Catania Multiservizi and Catania Multiservizi, C-561/19, EU:C:2021:799, paras 32-59 |
| C-274/11 | jurisdiction | Binding | see judgment of 16 April 2013, Spain and Italy v Council, C-274/11, EU:C:2013:240, para 92 |
EPC article · 4
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Article 1 UPCA | jurisdiction | Binding | Das EPG ist ein gemeinsames Gericht der Vertragsmitgliedstaaten und unterliegt somit denselben Verpflichtungen nach dem Unionsrecht wie jedes nationale Gericht (Art. 1 EPGÜ). |
| Article 20 UPCA | jurisdiction | Binding | Das Gericht wendet das Unionsrecht in vollem Umfang an und achtet seinen Vorrang (Art. 20 EPGÜ). |
| Article 1 UPCA | jurisdiction | Binding | The UPC is a court common to the Contracting Member States and thus subject to the same obligations under Union law as any national court of the Contracting Member States (Art. 1 UPCA). |
| Article 20 UPCA | jurisdiction | Binding | The Court shall apply Union law in its entirety and shall respect its primacy (Art. 20 UPCA). |
courtName.EPO_OD · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rule 5(2) EPO Rules relating to Unitary Patent Protection | jurisdiction | Binding | Regel 5 (2) der EPA-Durchführungsordnung zum einheitlichen Patentschutz und wies die von Papst Licensing vorgebrachten Gegenargumente zurück |
| Rule 5(2) EPO Rules relating to Unitary Patent Protection | jurisdiction | Binding | The Division referred to Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1257/2012 and to Rule 5(2) of the EPO Rules relating to Unitary Patent Protection |
Rules of Procedure · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 97 | jurisdiction | Binding | Berufung gegen Entscheidung betreffend einen Antrag auf Aufhebung einer Entscheidung des Amtes, einen Antrag auf einheitliche Wirkung abzulehnen (R. 97 VerfO) |
| 97 | jurisdiction | Binding | concerning an appeal against a decision concerning an Application to annul a decision of the Office to reject a request for unitary effect (R. 97 RoP) |
UPC (CFI) · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CFI_1771/2025 | jurisdiction | Background | Datum: 30. Dezember 2025, Zentralkammer Paris, Aktenzeichen des Gerichts erster Instanz: UPC_CFI_1771/2025 |
| UPC_CFI_1771/2025 | jurisdiction | Background | Date: 30 December 2025, Central Division Paris, Action number of the file at First Instance: UPC_CFI_1771/2025 |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.