Where should I file?
PI grant rate by division, average time-to-decision, patent-owner-friendliness — by the numbers, not by gut feel.
We classify every UPC outcome: infringed, revoked, granted, dismissed. So questions that used to mean reading a hundred PDFs take one click to answer.
PI grant rate by division, average time-to-decision, patent-owner-friendliness — by the numbers, not by gut feel.
Ruling tendencies, PI grant rate, history with similar parties. Word-of-mouth made queryable.
Filing frequency, settle-vs-litigate ratio, win record, firms they retain, patents they assert.
Activity by firm, specialization, win records, recurring pairings. For GCs picking outside counsel.
Historical PI grant rate, revocation rate, infringement-finding rate. Settlements priced on data.
Push alerts when a competitor is sued, a portfolio patent is challenged, or a precedent lands.
Pick the right division. Read the right judge. Quote the right base rate in mediation. Build forum-shopping memos with citations, not anecdotes.
See the litigator viewBenchmark outside counsel by win record. Track adversaries before they file. Forecast settlement value with the actual UPC base rate.
See the in-house viewSecurity-for-costs deposits, grant rates, forfeiture rates by division. Sized for litigation funders and bond providers underwriting UPC security orders.
See the underwriter viewEverything we have, no credit card. Bring your own matter, or browse the corpus.
Yes. The UPC is pan-European, multilingual, three years old, and underserved by legacy patent-litigation tools. Adjacent EPO and national-office data is referenced where it sharpens a UPC question.
Forum strategy is choosing which of the UPC's 13 local, regional, and central divisions to file in. Divisions diverge in preliminary-injunction grant rates, time-to-decision, language of proceedings, and patent owner win share — the choice meaningfully shapes both odds and timeline.
New filings are indexed daily from the public docket. Decisions are extracted, classified, and surfaced as they land.
Yes — decisions are processed natively in their issued language, then normalized into structured outcomes a non-native reader can use.
Under R.158 of the UPC Rules of Procedure and Art. 69(4) UPCA, a defendant may ask the court to order the claimant to post security for the defendant's likely costs. The Court of Appeal in Syntorr v. Arthrex clarified that litigation-insurance policies can satisfy this requirement.