For litigators

Forum strategy on data, not war stories.

When the matter is high-stakes, gut feel doesn't survive cross-examination. UPClytics gives patent litigators the data behind the forum decision, the judge profile, and the settlement number — pulled from the public record of the Unified Patent Court, ready to cite in a memo.

Two questions

Two questions every UPC litigator brings.

01

Where should I file — and what is the actual PI grant rate there?

The public registry gives you decisions, not patterns. Preliminary-injunction grant rates, time-to-decision, and patent owner win share vary materially across the 13 divisions: Munich's local division has the deepest patent-owner-friendly track record, the Court of Appeal has been the headline-grabber on long-arm jurisdiction, and the divisions diverge by case category and language of proceedings.

02

What does drawing this judge mean?

Panel composition is a litigation variable. Each named UPC judge has a preliminary-injunction history, a time-to-decision profile, and prior pairings with the firms and parties on the other side. The visible benches are widely discussed; the rest of the court runs quieter, docket-shaping panels that the data picks up.

The market signal

Long-arm jurisdiction is the 2025 story.

The UPC Court of Appeal has expanded the court's effective reach to defendants seated outside the EU — the UK, Switzerland, even further afield — turning what was once a continental forum question into a global one. Forum strategy at the UPC now sits inside a broader jurisdictional calculus, and the data needs to keep pace.

UPC Court of Appeal long-arm line of decisions · 2024–2025

What you get

A litigation-grade workbench.

  • Forum scorecards: PI grant rate, median time-to-decision, patent owner win share, division by division.
  • Judge profiles: PI history, ruling-pattern indicators, prior pairings with firms and parties.
  • Outcome base rates: sliceable by technology, party type, case category — so the comparison is to similar matters.
  • Recent decisions feed: every new merits ruling, classified and linked to the underlying source.
  • Citation-ready figures: every number sourced to the public decisions for forum memos, briefs, and mediation positions.

Run the next matter on data.

A 30-minute walkthrough against a recent matter of yours — see what the historical base rate says about that division, that judge, and that party combination.