Rechtsfragen
Querschnittsansicht der Rechtsgrundsätze, wiederkehrender Argumente und des Stands der Technik, auf den sich das Gericht stützt.
Meistdiskutierte Rechtsgrundsätze
Wiederkehrende Rechtsgrundsätze über 1 Fälle mit extrahierter Begründung. Die Erfolgsquote zählt patenthalterfreundliche Ausgänge.
Häufigste zurückgewiesene Argumente
Argumente, die das UPC nicht akzeptiert hat, sortiert nach wiederholten Auftritten in Fällen.
| Argument | Partei | Fälle |
|---|---|---|
| cilag had urgency because it only became aware of the true extent of infringement and market risk (sana acceptance, price erosion risk) in april 2025 | Kläger | 1 |
| david vs. goliath argument: cilag's larger market position vs. rivolution's smaller size creates special urgency | Kläger | 1 |
| applications to submit further evidence after the oral hearing should be admitted | Kläger | 1 |
| feature of connector support received through distal-facing opening into recess is supported by multiple passages and figures in the application as filed | Kläger | 1 |
| provisional reimbursement of costs ordered in favour of applicant | Kläger | 1 |
| orbisk's food waste monitoring system infringes ep 3 198 245 | Kläger | 1 |
| r. 190 rop application for document production | Kläger | 1 |
| declaration that glucomen ican is 'goods suspected of infringing an ip right' under eu regulation 608/2013 should be granted as a provisional measure | Kläger | 1 |
| information order should include price, sales numbers, and cost data | Kläger | 1 |
| information disclosure should be subject to confidentiality | Beklagter | 1 |
| glucomen ican infringes claim 1 (feature 1.13(c)) because the event icons appear on the same screen as the timeline graph | Kläger | 1 |
| information order extending to prices and numbers of cabinets sold (for damages calculation) | Kläger | 1 |
| 60% reimbursement of court fees (eur 6,600) requested by edwards under r. 370.9(c) and 370.11 rop | Kläger | 1 |
| abm's belated (oral hearing) challenge that jp748 is not a realistic starting point for inventive step | Kläger | 1 |
| dependent claim 2 (adaptive feedback) saves the patent | Kläger | 1 |
| infringement of ep 2 437 696 b2 by philips' sleep therapy devices | Kläger | 1 |
| representative's illness prevented timely filing of sod and re-establishment of rights under r. 320 should be granted | Beklagter | 1 |
| default decision should be set aside under r. 356 rop | Beklagter | 1 |
| counterclaim for declaration of non-infringement of revised product (new product 2) is admissible | Beklagter | 1 |
| patent lacks inventive step / contains added matter (counterclaim for revocation) | Beklagter | 1 |
| application to deposit three further physical objects (bb40a-c) as late exhibits | Beklagter | 1 |
| invalidity of ep 2 839 083 b9 as originally granted (revocation counterclaim) | Beklagter | 1 |
| infringement is impossible due to features outside the patent claim that prevent the patented function from being achieved | Beklagter | 1 |
| requested case value of eur 500,000 for determining recoverable-costs ceiling | Kläger | 1 |
| literal infringement of claim features 1(d)(iii), 1(h), 1(j) and 1(k)(iii) of ep 1 910 572 by hcr products | Kläger | 1 |
Meistzitierter Stand der Technik
Über substanzielle Hauptsachefälle herangezogene Schriften und ihre typische Rolle.
| Schriftreferenz | Vorherrschende Rolle | Fälle |
|---|---|---|
| WO 2011/119896 | Abgegrenzt | 1 |
| JP748 (Japanese patent on position therapy device, circa 1990/1991) | Neuheitsschädlich | 1 |
| P25 (Handbook of Modern Sensors, 2003) | Hintergrund | 1 |
| P28 (textbook for sleep medicine, evidencing accelerometers in wrist actigraphy) | Hintergrund | 1 |
| WO 2007/001986 A2 (WO986) — EP572 priority document | Hintergrund | 1 |
| D12, D13, D14 (prior art documents referenced in proceedings) | Erfindungsmüh-Kombination | 1 |