UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht:

ACT_23636/2024

Einstweilige MaßnahmenEinstweilige MaßnahmenMunich LDApplication for provisional measures
Dieser Fall zitiert
In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

UPC (Erstinstanz) · 4

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
UPC_CFI_443/2023limitation of validity arguments to best three in provisional measuresBindendthe number of arguments raised against the validity of the patent must generally be reduced to the best three from the respondent's point of view (UPC_CFI_443/2023 ACT_589207/2023 (LD Munich), order of 21 May 2024, 3rd LS)
UPC_CFI_452/2023temporal urgency — one month windowAbgegrenztIn view of the diverging case law on temporal urgency, which grants the applicant only one month, e.g. in UPC_CFI_452/2023 (Local Division Düsseldorf), order of 9 April 2024, GRUR-RS 2024, 7207, Rz. 128, the Local Division Munich adheres to its case law granting two months.
UPC_CFI_452/2024analogous application of R. 118.5 RoP — unintentional loophole requiredÜberzeugendUPC_CFI_452/2024 (LD Düsseldorf), Order of 9 April 2024, headnote 2 and p. 34 f., GRUR- RS 2024, 7207, Rz. 161 - 163
UPC_CFI_249/2023analogous application of R. 118.5 RoP (contra)Abgegrenzta.A.: UPC_CFI_249/2023 ( LD Munich), order of 19 December 2023, headnote, GRUR-RS 2023, 40572

EPÜ-Artikel · 1

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
25direct infringement actsBindendIn case of a product claim directed to a composition it is sufficient for the applicant to allege and prove that at the time of any act of use under Art. 25 UPCA by the respondent, the attacked composition had all the features of the patent claim

UPC-Berufungsgericht · 1

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
UPC_CoA_435/2023hearing of respondent in provisional measures proceedingsBindendUPC_CoA_435/2023; UPC_CoA_436/2023; UPC_CoA_437/2023; UPC_CoA_438/2023, Order of 3 April 2023, paragraph 2

Verfahrensordnung · 1

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
118.5analogous application in provisional measuresBindendFor an analogous application of R. 118.5 RoP, the absence of an unintentional loophole is a basic requirement for such an application
Zitiert in
Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.