UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht:

ACT_590302/2023

BOOST POWER FACTOR CORRECTION CIRCUIT (BOOST PFC)

VerletzungHauptverletzungsklageDusseldorf LDInfringement Action
Parteien

Kläger

  • Tridonic GmbH & Co KG
Vertreter: Markus B. Bölling (Mitscherlich Patent- und Rechtsanwälte PartGmbB, Munich); Christian Kraeh (Mitscherlich Patent- und Rechtsanwälte PartGmbB, Munich)

Beklagte

  • CUPOWER Shenzhen Xiezhen Electronics Co., Ltd
  • CUPOWER Europe GmbH
Vertreter: Eva Geschke (Wildanger Kehrwald Graf. v. Schwerin & Partner mbB, Düsseldorf); Jan-Caspar Maiers (Wildanger Kehrwald Graf. v. Schwerin & Partner mbB, Düsseldorf)
Richter
  • KlepschPresiding Judge
  • ThomLegally Qualified Judge and Rapporteur
  • AgergaardLegally Qualified Judge
  • SchoberTechnically Qualified Judge
Patente
  • EP 2011218
CPC-Codes: H02M1/4225, H02M1/0009, Y02B70/10

Technologiebereich: Semiconductors · Power Semis

Sektor: Power Generation

Ausgang
Nicht verletztNicht verletzt
Eingereicht:
Erste Entscheidung: 7. März 2025
Sprache:

Düsseldorf Local Division full merits judgment in an infringement action by Tridonic GmbH & Co KG against CUPOWER entities concerning EP 2 011 218 B1 (a patent relating to LED driver/control circuits). The court dismissed the infringement action in its entirety, finding that the accused LED power supply products do not fulfil feature 7.4 of the patent (decoupling element) because the capacitor C3 in the defendants' design does not achieve the complete electrical separation required by the claim – it remains continuously connected to the control unit regardless of switch state. The defendants' counterclaim for revocation was also dismissed (patent maintained). Costs were split: claimant bears costs of the infringement action; defendants bear costs of the revocation counterclaim equally.

Ansprüche
Streitigall
Aufrechterhaltenall
Nicht verletztall
Hinweise: Düsseldorf Local Division dismissed infringement of EP 2 011 218 B1 (feature 7.4 of the main claim not met); product claim (Anspruch 6) also not infringed for same reasons; revocation counterclaim dismissed, patent maintained.