UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht:

APL_588420/2023

VAPORIZATION DEVICE SYSTEMS AND METHODS

BerufungenHauptberufungCourt of AppealAppeal RoP220.2
Parteien

Kläger

Vertreter: Hon.-Prof. Dr. Henrik Holzapfel (McDermott Will & Emery)

Beklagte

  • Juul Labs International, Inc.
Vertreter: Bernhard Thum (Thum & Partner); Jonas Weickert (Thum & Partner); Andreas Mötsch (Thum & Partner); Tobias Wuttke (Bardehle Pagenberg Partnerschaft mbB)
Richter
  • Klaus GrabinskiPresident of the Court of Appeal
  • Françoise BarutelLegally qualified judge
  • Peter BlokLegally qualified judge, judge-rapporteur
Patente
  • EP 3 498 115
  • EP 3 504 990
  • EP 3 504 989
  • EP 3 504 991
  • EP 3 430 921
CPC-Codes: A61M2016/0021, A61M2205/8237, A61M2205/3606, H02J7/00, A61M15/0015, A61M15/002, A61M15/0016, A24F7/02, A61M2205/3331, A24F40/485, A61M15/06, A61M2205/8206

Sektor: Electric Techniques

Ausgang
Abgewiesen
Eingereicht:
Erste Entscheidung: 3. Apr. 2024
Sprache:

Court of Appeal dismissed Juul Labs International Inc.'s appeal against five first-instance orders allowing NJOY Netherlands B.V. to rectify the incorrectly stated defendant name in five revocation actions (EP 3 498 115, EP 3 504 990, EP 3 504 989, EP 3 504 991, EP 3 430 921). The court held that despite the naming error, it should have been clear to the appellant that the actions were directed against it as the registered proprietor. No cost order was made as the appeal did not conclude the revocation actions.