UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

APL 588426/2023

·EP3498115 +4 more: VAPORIZATION DEVICE SYSTEMS AND METHODS

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Verfahrensart
Berufung
Kategorie
Hauptberufung
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Hon.-Prof. Dr. Henrik Holzapfel (McDermott Will & Schulte)
Beklagte
Vertreter: Bernhard Thum (Thum & Partner); Jonas Weickert (Thum & Partner); Andreas Mötsch (Thum & Partner); Tobias Wuttke (Bardehle Pagenberg)
Division
Court of Appeal
Richter
Technology
Electric Techniques
Sprache
Erste Entscheidung
3. Apr. 2024
Entscheidungen
  • 2024-04-03
    AbgewiesenBerufungsentscheidungAppeal RoP220.2

    Court of Appeal order rejecting Juul Labs International's appeal against the Court of First Instance order allowing rectification of the defendant's name in five revocation actions filed by NJOY Netherlands B.V. (originally naming Juul Labs, Inc. instead of registered proprietor Juul Labs International, Inc.). The Court of Appeal held the rectification was permissible since the appellant was not unreasonably prejudiced. No costs order was made in this interlocutory appeal, to be deferred to the final merits decision. Appeal rejected.

    Rechtsfragen:Rectification of defendant's name (party substitution)Costs in interlocutory appeal (R. 242.1 RoP)E-cigarette / vaping device patents
Dokumente
  • A32E2508BFBD5829DB775169D75B4D36_en.pdf2024-04-03ENGLISH