UPC_APP_2192/2025

Video decoding device, video decoding method, and program

Prozessuale & UnteranträgeRücknahmeanträgeMunich LDApplication Rop 265—Vergleich erfolgt: Vor Hauptsache

Übersicht Entscheidungen Dokumente Zeitverlauf

Parteien

Kläger

NEC Corporation

Vertreter: Müller (Bardehle Pagenberg); Henke (Bardehle Pagenberg)

Beklagte

TCL Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG(TCL Group)
TCL Industrial Holdings Co., Ltd.(TCL Group)
TCT Mobile Germany GmbH(TCL Group)
TCT Mobile Europe SAS(TCL Group)
TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd.(TCL Group)
TCL Operations Polska Sp. z.o.o(TCL Group)
TCL Overseas Marketing Ltd.(TCL Group)

Vertreter: Nack (Noerr Partnerschaftsgesellschaft mbB); Gajeck (Noerr Partnerschaftsgesellschaft mbB)

Richter

Ulrike VoßPresiding Judge / Judge-Rapporteur
Daniel VoßLegally Qualified Judge
András KupeczLegally Qualified Judge

Patente

EP 2 645 714

CPC-Codes: H04N19/503, H04N19/593, H04N19/12, H04N19/134, H04N19/172, H04N19/46, H04N19/91, H04N19/60, H04N19/70, H04N19/156, H04N19/184, H04N19/176…

Sektor: Telecommunications

Ausgang

Zurückgenommen

Eingereicht: —

Erste Entscheidung: 24. Jan. 2025

Sprache: —

Vergleich erfolgt: Vor Hauptsache

Decision by Munich Local Division (UPC_CFI_487/2023, 24 January 2025) permitting withdrawal of TCL defendants' counterclaims for revocation and FRAND-licence offer. 60% of court fees were reimbursed for the revocation counterclaim. The court held that court fees are payable for FRAND-licence offer counterclaims by analogy under R. 370 RoP, and that such fees had been properly paid so no full refund was warranted.