UPC_APP_2273/2025

VIDEO DECODING DEVICE, VIDEO DECODING METHOD, AND PROGRAM

Prozessuale & UnteranträgeRücknahmeanträgeMunich LDApplication Rop 265—Vergleich erfolgt: Vor Hauptsache

Übersicht Entscheidungen Zitate Dokumente Zeitverlauf

Parteien

Kläger

NEC Corporation

Vertreter: Müller (Bardehle Pagenberg); Henke (Bardehle Pagenberg)

Beklagte

TCL Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG(TCL Group)
TCL Industrial Holdings Co., Ltd.(TCL Group)
TCT Mobile Germany GmbH(TCL Group)
TCT Mobile Europe SAS(TCL Group)
TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd.(TCL Group)
TCL Operations Polska Sp. z.o.o(TCL Group)
TCL Overseas Marketing Ltd.(TCL Group)

Vertreter: Nack (Noerr Partnerschaftsgesellschaft mbB); Gajeck (Noerr Partnerschaftsgesellschaft mbB)

Richter

Ulrike VoßPresiding Judge and Judge-Rapporteur
Daniel VoßLegally Qualified Judge
András KupeczLegally Qualified Judge

Patente

EP3057321

CPC-Codes: H04N19/503, H04N19/593, H04N19/12, H04N19/134, H04N19/172, H04N19/46, H04N19/91, H04N19/60, H04N19/70, H04N19/156, H04N19/184, H04N19/176…

Sektor: Telecommunications

Ausgang

Vergleich

Eingereicht: —

Erste Entscheidung: 17. Jan. 2025

Sprache: —

Vergleich erfolgt: Vor Hauptsache — settled commercially

Decision from the Munich Local Division (UPC_CFI_498/2023) declaring the infringement action by NEC against TCL entities closed following a contractual settlement reached before closure of the written proceedings. NEC withdrew the infringement action (R. 265 RoP) and requested 60% reimbursement of court fees, relying on the settlement. The Court confirmed each party would bear its own costs and addressed the fee reimbursement request.