UPC_APP_29027/2025

PLANOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATE ORIGINAL PLATE, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING PLANOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATE, AND PLANOGRAPHIC PRINTING METHOD

Prozessuale & UnteranträgeVerfahrensführungsanordnungenMannheim LDApplication Rop 333—

Übersicht Entscheidungen Zitate Dokumente Zeitverlauf

Parteien

Kläger

FUJIFILM Corporation(Fujifilm Group)

Vertreter: Christof Augenstein (Kather Augenstein Rechtsanwälte PartGmbB)

Beklagte

Kodak GmbH(Kodak Group)
Kodak Graphic Communications GmbH(Kodak Group)
Kodak Holding GmbH(Kodak Group)

Vertreter: Elena Hennecke (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer Rechtsanwälte Steuerberater PartG mbB)

Richter

TochtermannPresiding judge, judge-rapporteur
BöttcherLegally qualified judge
AgergaardLegally qualified judge
WismethTechnically qualified judge

Patente

EP 3 511 174

CPC-Codes: B41M1/06, B41C2201/14, B41C2210/24, B41C2210/04, G03F7/11, G03F7/00, B41C2210/08, B41N1/08, B41C2201/02, B41C2201/04, B41N3/03, B41N1/083…

Ausgang

Abgewiesen

Eingereicht: —

Erste Entscheidung: 16. Juli 2025

Sprache: —

FUJIFILM Corporation's request for review of the judge-rapporteur's order rejecting its intended enforcement warning (penalty application under R. 354.4 RoP) was rejected. The panel upheld the judge-rapporteur's reasoning: no specific time periods or penalty amounts were fixed in the main decision for the destruction/recall/removal orders, and claimant should have challenged those points on appeal rather than via panel review.