UPC_APP_32933/2025

Prozessuale & UnteranträgeVerfahrensführungsanordnungenMannheim LDProcedural Order—

Dieser Fall zitiert

In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
Art. 7 Enforcement Directive 2004/48	jurisdiction	Bindend	as demanded by Art. 7 of the Enforcement Directive (cf. Tilmann, Einheitspatent, Art. 60 para 61)
Art. 8 ECHR	jurisdiction	Bindend	fundamental rights of the defendant according to Art. 8 ECHR, Art. 7 Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU as well as national fundamental rights
Art. 7 EU Charter	jurisdiction	Bindend	fundamental rights of the defendant according to Art. 8 ECHR, Art. 7 Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU as well as national fundamental rights

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
UPC_CoA_239/2025	jurisdiction	Bindend	Upon appeal the CoA (order of 28 May 2025, APL_13242/2025, UPC_CoA_239/2025) accepted the application in a modified version allowing the Applicant to carry out monitoring
UPC_CoA_239/2025	jurisdiction	Bindend	cf. CoA, Order of 28 May 2025, APL_13242/2025, UPC_CoA_239/2025, paras. 19 et seqq.

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
UPC_CFI_397/2023	jurisdiction	Überzeugend	cf. LD Paris 1 March 2024 – UPC_CFI_397/2023 para 59: "inspect products, devices, methods, premises or local situations in situ"

Zitiert in

Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.