UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht: —

UPC_APP_42138/2024

METHOD AND MEANS FOR BROWSING BY WALKING

Prozessuale & UnteranträgeVerfahrensführungsanordnungenParis CDApplication Rop 333—
ÜbersichtEntscheidungenZitateDokumenteZeitverlauf
Parteien

Kläger

  • Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy
Vertreter: (not specified) ((not specified))

Beklagte

  • Microsoft Corporation
Vertreter: Tilman Müller-Stoy (Bardehle Pagenberg)
Richter

Französische Kammer — Einzelrichter anonymisiert.

  • Panel member (anonymized)Presiding Judge / judge-rapporteur
  • Panel member (anonymized)Legally qualified judge
  • Panel member (anonymized)Technically qualified judge
Patente
  • EP 2 671 173
CPC-Codes: G06F16/951, G06F16/24578, G06Q30/0619, G06F16/9537, H04W4/02, G06F16/24575, H04W4/029

Sektor: Computing & AI

Ausgang
Abgewiesen
Eingereicht: —
Erste Entscheidung: 17. Sept. 2024
Sprache: —

Order of the Central Division Paris Seat in Microsoft v Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies (EP 2 671 173). The panel dismissed Microsoft's application to review the judge-rapporteur's earlier order that had rejected Microsoft's request to declare Suinno's action manifestly inadmissible under R. 361 RoP. The panel held that manifest inadmissibility requires the defect to be clearly evident without in-depth analysis. Microsoft's alternative request for leave to appeal and for a preliminary ruling by the CJEU on the independence requirement under Art. 48(5) UPCA was also addressed.