UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed: —

UPC_APP_42138/2024

METHOD AND MEANS FOR BROWSING BY WALKING

Procedural & sub-applicationsCase Management OrdersParis CDApplication Rop 333—
OverviewDecisionsCitationsDocumentsTimeline
Parties

Claimants

  • Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy
Reps: (not specified) ((not specified))

Respondents

  • Microsoft Corporation
Reps: Tilman Müller-Stoy (Bardehle Pagenberg)
Judges

French-seated division — individual judges anonymized.

  • Panel member (anonymized)Presiding Judge / judge-rapporteur
  • Panel member (anonymized)Legally qualified judge
  • Panel member (anonymized)Technically qualified judge
Patents
  • EP 2 671 173
CPC codes: G06F16/951, G06F16/24578, G06Q30/0619, G06F16/9537, H04W4/02, G06F16/24575, H04W4/029

Sector: Computing & AI

Outcome
Dismissed
Filed: —
First decided: Sep 17, 2024
Language: —

Order of the Central Division Paris Seat in Microsoft v Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies (EP 2 671 173). The panel dismissed Microsoft's application to review the judge-rapporteur's earlier order that had rejected Microsoft's request to declare Suinno's action manifestly inadmissible under R. 361 RoP. The panel held that manifest inadmissibility requires the defect to be clearly evident without in-depth analysis. Microsoft's alternative request for leave to appeal and for a preliminary ruling by the CJEU on the independence requirement under Art. 48(5) UPCA was also addressed.