- Case details
- StatusClaim dismissedActionProcedural applicationCategoryCase management orders
- Parties
- Claimants
- Division
- Paris CD
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringTelecommunications · Digital communication · Computer technology
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Sep 17, 2024
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Paris CD | Locked |
| Judge Paolo Catallozzi | Locked |
| Judge Tatyana Zhilova | Locked |
| Judge Wiem Samoud | Locked |
At the UPC: Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy (29 cases)·Microsoft Group (34 cases)
This dispute contains 26 other proceedings
UPC CoA 51/2026·UPC CoA 21/2026·UPC CFI 544/2026·UPC CoA 911/2025·UPC CoA 883/2025 and 21 more
- 2024-09-17Application RoP 333Public
Summary: Order of the Central Division Paris Seat in Microsoft v Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies (EP 2 671 173). The panel dismissed Microsoft's application to review the judge-rapporteur's earlier order that had rejected Microsoft's request to declare Suinno's action manifestly inadmissible under R. 361 RoP. The panel held that manifest inadmissibility requires the defect to be clearly evident without in-depth analysis. Microsoft's alternative request for leave to appeal and for a preliminary ruling by the CJEU on the independence requirement under Art. 48(5) UPCA was also addressed.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Manifest inadmissibility under R. 361 RoP
- Independence of representatives under Art. 48(5) UPCA
- Preliminary ruling reference to CJEU
- C5B389F6811A0F805E5C1F870CEEA723_en.pdf2024-09-17EN