UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht: 27. Juni 2023

UPC_CFI_182/2023

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PRODUCING MILK FOAM

Einstweilige MaßnahmenEinstweilige MaßnahmenVienna LDProvisional measuresCase Closed
Zusammenfassung in einfacher Sprache

CUP&CINO applied for provisional measures against Alpina Coffee Systems for alleged infringement of EP 3398487 B1 (a milk foam device with a pipe section of defined minimum length) before the Vienna Local Division. The court denied the provisional measures because the accused product's pipe section measured approximately 10 cm — far below the 0.5 m minimum required by claim 2 — meaning no infringement was established. CUP&CINO was ordered to pay EUR 25,600 in final costs, as the court ruled these costs cannot be revisited in any subsequent main proceedings.

Angenommene Argumente
Was das Gericht akzeptiert hat — nach Partei.
  • Attacked product does not implement the claimed pipe section (Leitungsabschnitt) feature of EP 3398487 claim 2

    BeklagterRechtsgrundlage: Art. 69 EPC and Protocol; Art. 24(1)(c) UPCA

    Hinweis: Vienna Local Division found the knee connector and coupling piece in the respondent's product had a combined length of approximately 10 cm, far below the 0.5 m minimum required by the patent claim; no infringement established.

Zurückgewiesene Argumente
Was das Gericht nicht akzeptiert hat — und warum.
  • Alpina Coffee's milk foam device infringes EP 3398487 claim 2

    KlägerRechtsgrundlage: Art. 69 EPC; Art. 24(1)(c) UPCA

    Begründung: The attacked product's pipe section did not meet the length requirements of the claim even on the most generous interpretation; claim feature (i) was not realised.

Hinweise zur Anspruchsauslegung

The Vienna Local Division construed the 'pipe section' (Leitungsabschnitt) feature of claim 2 of EP 3398487 (milk foam device). The court found that the claim required a minimum pipe section length of 0.5 m; the attacked product's combined knee connector and coupling part measured only approximately 10 cm, failing to meet this requirement. The court declined to find infringement even considering a broader purposive construction.