UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht: 1. Mai 2024

UPC_CFI_189/2024

PROSTHETIC HEART VALVE

NichtigkeitHauptnichtigkeitsklageParis CDRevocationCase Closed
Parteien

Kläger

Vertreter: Emmanuel Larere (Gide Loyrette Nouel AARPI); Jean-Hyacinthe de Mitry (Gide Loyrette Nouel AARPI); Jonathan Stafford (Marks & Clerck LLP); Gregory Carty Hornsby (Marks & Clerck LLP)

Beklagte

Vertreter: Siddharth Kusumakar (Powell Gilbert (Europe) LLP); Bryce Matthewson (Powell Gilbert (Europe) LLP); Jonas Weickert (Thum & Partner); Bernhard Thum (Thum & Partner)
Richter

Französische Kammer — Einzelrichter anonymisiert.

  • Panel member (anonymized)
  • Panel member (anonymized)
  • Panel member (anonymized)
Patente
  • EP4151181
  • EP 4 151 181 B1
  • EP 4 151 181
CPC-Codes: A61F2220/0075, A61F2/2418, A61F2230/0054, A61F2250/0069, A61F2/2412, A61F2250/0097, A61F2/2433, A61F2250/0036

Technologiebereich: Medical Devices · Implants

Sektor: Pharmaceutical & Medical

Ausgang
Patent geändertAufrechterhalten in geänderter Fassung
Eingereicht: 1. Mai 2024
Erste Entscheidung: 20. Okt. 2025
Sprache: English

Decision of the Paris Central Division (Paris Seat) dated 20 October 2025 in the revocation action by Meril entities against Edwards Lifesciences Corporation and the counterclaim for infringement by Edwards regarding EP 4 151 181 B1 (prosthetic heart valve technology). The revocation action was rejected; however, the patent was maintained only in the form of Auxiliary Request 2 (amended). The infringement counterclaim was granted: Meril entities were found to infringe claims 1, 4, 6–12 as amended. Edwards was granted an injunction preventing Meril from all infringing acts with products according to those claims in Contracting Member States, with an exception for XL-size valves (exceeding 30 mm) which was denied on proportionality grounds. Meril was ordered to provide information on infringing products, recall and destroy infringing products, and publish the decision in five media. Damages are to be determined in separate proceedings. Costs of the counterclaim were borne by Meril jointly and severally; costs of the revocation action were shared (each party bears own costs given the patent amendment dynamic).

Im UPC-Register öffnen
Ansprüche
Streitig1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
Geändert1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
Verletzt1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
Hinweise: Paris Central Division rejected revocation of EP4151181 (prosthetic heart valve); patent maintained as amended per Auxiliary Request 2; Meril entities found to infringe claims 1, 4, 6-12 as amended, with injunction granted except for XL-size valves.