UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC CFI 2/2023

1. Juni 2023·EP4108782 Einheitspatent · COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ANALYTE DETECTION

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Case ClosedIn der Berufung aufgehoben, 11. März 2024
Verfahrensart
Einstweilige Verfügung
Kategorie
Einstweilige Maßnahmen
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter
Division
Munich LD
Technologie
  • Instruments
    Analysis of biological materials
  • Chemistry
    Biotechnology
Sprache
German
Erste Entscheidung
23. Juni 2023
Letzte Entscheidung
5. Dez. 2023
EPA-Einspruch
Berufung
Im Vergleich
Die Bilanz des Gerichts für diese Art von Verfahren, gezählt in erstinstanzlichen Entscheidungen. Eine Zahl in Klammern gibt an, auf wie vielen Entscheidungen eine Quote beruht.
Einstweilige Verfügung erlassenMedian Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung
Gesamt-UPC54% (38/70)124
Munich LDGesperrtGesperrt
Richter Matthias ZigannGesperrtGesperrt
Richter Tobias PichlmaierGesperrtGesperrt
Richter András KupeczGesperrtGesperrt
Richter Eric EnderlinGesperrtGesperrt

Vor dem UPC: 10x Genomics, Inc. (40 Verfahren)·NanoString Group (21 Verfahren)

Entscheidungen
  • 2023-12-05
    Application for provisional measuresÖffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: The Munich Local Division imposed a penalty payment of EUR 100,000 on NanoString Technologies entities for non-compliance with a preliminary injunction under Article 62 UPCA, clarifying that no separate enforcement order is required under Article 82(4) UPCA and that national enforcement law requirements do not apply.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (3)
    • Penalty payment for violation of provisional injunction (Art. 82(4) UPCA)
    • No separate enforcement order required
    • Rule 118.8 RoP inapplicable to Art. 62 orders
  • 2023-09-19
    Application for provisional measuresÖffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: The Munich Local Division granted provisional measures to 10x Genomics and President and Fellows of Harvard College against NanoString Technologies (EP 4 108 782 — spatial genomics), prohibiting NanoString from offering, selling or delivering MERSCOPE decoder probes, with penalty of up to EUR 250,000 per violation; the amount in dispute was set at EUR 7 million.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (5)
    • Provisional measures Art. 62 UPCA
    • Prima facie validity unitary patent
    • Delay in seeking provisional measures
    • Indirect patent infringement
    • Enforcement of unitary patent vs. European patent
  • 2023-09-19
    Application for provisional measuresÖffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: HEADNOTES SHEET ONLY (Leitsaetze, Lokalkammer Muenchen), one page, image-only with no text layer. It states three legal principles on provisional measures under Art. 62 UPCA and contains NO operative part, no parties and no order. It is the headnote page of the 2023-09-19 provisional-measures ruling on this docket, whose two other PDFs are already extracted as preliminary_injunction_granted. The outcome fields are set to MATCH those siblings so that collapseDecisionVariants folds this variant into the same ruling; they are NOT read from the face of this document, which decides nothing.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (3)
    • preponderant likelihood sufficient for validity conviction under Art. 62 UPCA
    • unreasonable delay in seeking provisional measures runs from knowledge of infringement
    • enforcement of a non-unitary European patent is not equivalent to enforcing a unitary patent
  • 2023-07-10
    Application for provisional measuresÖffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: The Munich Local Division granted a deadline extension in the 10x Genomics/Harvard v. NanoString preliminary injunction proceedings following a request by the respondent side.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (1)
    • Deadline extension Rule 9.3 RoP
  • 2023-07-06
    Application for provisional measuresÖffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: The Munich Local Division issued an order under Rule 7.1 RoP determining that translations of English-language exhibits were not required in the 10x Genomics/Harvard v. NanoString preliminary injunction proceedings.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (1)
    • Translation of exhibits Rule 7.1 RoP
  • 2023-06-30
    Application for provisional measuresÖffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: The Munich Local Division issued a supplementary procedural order correcting an earlier scheduling order to require that the defence include the arguments from the protective brief (Schutzschrift) in German, the language of proceedings.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (3)
    • Language of defence
    • Protective brief (Schutzschrift)
    • Procedural correction
  • 2023-06-23
    Application for provisional measuresÖffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: The Munich Local Division issued a scheduling and briefing order for the oral hearing in 10x Genomics and Harvard's preliminary injunction application against NanoString Technologies.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (2)
    • Preliminary injunction scheduling
    • Oral hearing
DokumenttitelDatumÖffentlich
workflow closed2025-07-16Nicht öffentlich
Outcome of the Order2025-07-16Nicht öffentlich
rectification2025-07-16Öffentlich
Outcome of the Order2025-07-16Nicht öffentlich
workflow closed2025-07-16Nicht öffentlich
Outcome of the Order2025-07-16Nicht öffentlich
workflow closed2025-07-16Öffentlich
Outcome of the Order2025-07-16Nicht öffentlich
workflow closed2025-07-16Öffentlich
Outcome of the Order2025-07-16Nicht öffentlich
Zusammenfassung in einfacher Sprache

10x Genomics and President and Fellows of Harvard College obtained provisional measures against NanoString Technologies before the Munich Local Division for infringement of unitary patent EP 4108782 covering spatial genomics analyte detection methods. The court found preponderant likelihood of validity and infringement, and granted an injunction against MERSCOPE decoder probes covering both direct and indirect infringement, with EUR 250,000-per-violation penalties. In subsequent penalty proceedings, the court imposed a EUR 100,000 penalty for NanoString's failure to promptly update its website in compliance with the order, clarifying that no separate enforcement order is needed under Art. 82(4) UPCA for Art. 62 provisional measures.

Angenommene Argumente
Was das Gericht akzeptiert hat — nach Partei.
  • Prima facie validity of unitary patent EP 4108782 established at preponderant likelihood standard

    KlägerRechtsgrundlage: Art. 62 UPCA

    Hinweis: No relevant prior art was presented by NanoString; court found preponderant likelihood of validity sufficient.

  • NanoString MERSCOPE decoder probes directly and indirectly infringe EP 4108782 (spatial genomics method patent)

    KlägerRechtsgrundlage: Art. 62 UPCA; Art. 64 UPCA

    Hinweis: Court found both direct infringement by applying the patented method and indirect infringement through supply of decoder probes as essential components.

  • Urgency: enforcement of European patent without unitary effect in all member states separately is not an equivalent remedy to UPC enforcement; delay assessed from when UPC enforcement became possible

    KlägerRechtsgrundlage: Art. 62 UPCA

    Hinweis: Court accepted that prior national enforcement steps do not amount to unreasonable delay for UPC provisional measures purposes.

Zurückgewiesene Argumente
Was das Gericht nicht akzeptiert hat — und warum.
  • Applicants delayed unreasonably in seeking provisional measures

    BeklagterRechtsgrundlage: Art. 62 UPCA

    Begründung: Delay must be assessed from when infringement became known and from when UPC enforcement was available; prior enforcement of European patents nationally is not equivalent and does not start the delay clock for UPC measures.

Hinweise zur Anspruchsauslegung

The Munich Local Division construed claim 1 of EP 4108782 (a spatial genomics method for analyte detection using decoder probes). The court found that NanoString's MERSCOPE decoder probes fell within the claim scope for both direct and indirect infringement. The court also addressed indirect infringement, finding that decoder probes are essential components for application of the patented method.