UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht: 14. Jan. 2025

UPC_CFI_26/2025

PACKAGE, IN PARTICULAR FOR FOOD PRODUCTS

VerletzungHauptverletzungsklageVienna LDInfringementCase Closed
Dieser Fall zitiert
In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

UPC (Erstinstanz) · 4

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
UPC_CFI_239/2023infringement by equivalentsÜberzeugendWhile there is no harmonized approach to determining an equivalent use of the teaching of the patent among the Local Divisions of this Court yet (see: Local Chamber in The Hague, decision on the merits of 22 November 2024, UPC_CFI_239/2023
UPC_CFI_471/2023infringement by equivalentsÜberzeugendLocal Chamber in Mannheim, decision on the merits of 6. Juni 2025, UPC_CFI_471/2023 mn 167 with reference to the Year Book 2023 / I of the International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (AIPPI)
UPC_CFI_363/2024infringement by equivalentsÜberzeugendLocal Chamber in Paris, decision on the merits 1. August 2025, UPC_CFI_363/2024
Brussels Local Chamber Beslissing ten gronde 17.01.2025infringement by equivalentsÜberzeugendBrussels Local Chamber, Beslissing ten gronde of 17 January 2025

Verfahrensordnung · 2

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
RoP_rule_25counterclaim for revocation — content requirementsBindendR 25.1 RoP requires the counterclaim for revocation to contain an indication of the facts relied on (R 25.1 (c) RoP) and the evidence relied on
RoP_rule_preamblefront-loaded procedureBindendThe parties are under an obligation to set out their full case as early as possible (Preamble RoP 7, last sentence)

EPÜ-Artikel · 1

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
70(1)authentic text of patentBindendAccording to Art 70 (1) EPC, the text of a European patent in the language of the proceedings shall be the authentic text in any proceedings before the European Patent Office and in any Contracting State.

courtName.national_DE_OLG · 1

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
LG München I 7 O 9383/25infringement by equivalentsHintergrundLG München I (7. Zivilkammer), order on the merits of 25. September 2025 – 7 O 9383/25 for a summary of the doctrines of equivalence or equivalence test of the EU member states
Zitiert in
Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.