UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht:

UPC_CFI_274/2023

COMPACT SERVICE MODULE WHICH IS INTENDED FOR ELECTROLYTIC ALUMINIUM PRODUCTION PLANTS

Prozessuale & UnteranträgeKostenfestsetzungenHamburg LDDetermination of damages and compensation
Parteien

Kläger

  • Fives ECL, SAS
Vertreter: Konstantin Schallmoser (Bonabry Partnerschaft); Daniel Hoppe (Bonabry Partnerschaft); Carl-Alexander Dinges (Bonabry Partnerschaft)

Beklagte

  • REEL GmbH
Vertreter: Benjamin Schröer (Hogan Lovells International LLP); Leonhard Hollander (Hogan Lovells International LLP)
Richter
  • Sabine KlepschPresiding judge and judge-rapporteur
Patente
  • EP 1 740 740
CPC-Codes: C25C3/14, C25C3/10, C25C3/06, C25C7/00
Ausgang
Abgewiesen
Eingereicht:
Erste Entscheidung: 17. Nov. 2023
Letzte Entscheidung: 11. Feb. 2026
Sprache:

The Hamburg Local Division dismissed Fives ECL's action for determination of damages based on a prior national court judgment (Landgericht Düsseldorf), holding that the UPC lacks jurisdiction under Article 32 UPCA to assess damages that were not preceded by a UPC infringement action; a national patent enforcement judgment cannot found UPC damages jurisdiction.