UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht: 22. Apr. 2025

UPC_CFI_337/2025

FINING OF BOROALUMINO SILICATE GLASSES

NichtigkeitHauptnichtigkeitsklageMunich CDRevocationCase Closed
Dieser Fall zitiert
In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Verfahrensordnung · 2

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
105.5interim conference orderBindendThis order sets out the decisions taken at the interim conference as required by Rule 105.5 of the Rules of Procedure ("RoP") of the Unified Patent Court ("UPC")
118.5costs decisionBindendPursuant to Art. 69(1) UPCA in conjunction with R. 118.5 RoP, the Court shall decide on the obligation to bear costs.

UPC-Berufungsgericht · 2

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
UPC_CoA_464/2024inventive step and sufficiencyBindendin light of the Court of Appeal's recent decisions dated 25 November 2025, in cases UPC_CoA_464/2024 and related cases (Meril/Edwards), as well as cases UPC_CoA_528 and 529/2024 (Amgen/Sanofi and Regeneron).
UPC_CoA_528/2024inventive step and sufficiencyBindendas well as cases UPC_CoA_528 and 529/2024 (Amgen/Sanofi and Regeneron). The submissions should address the legal implications of the aforementioned Court of Appeal decisions only

courtName.other · 1

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
Article 69(1)obligation to bear costs – unsuccessful partyBindendPursuant to Art. 69(1) UPCA in conjunction with R. 118.5 RoP, the Court shall decide on the obligation to bear costs.
Zitiert in
Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.