UPC_CFI_368/2024

ROTARY ELECTRIC MACHINE EQUIPPED WITH A MEANS OF ADJUSTING THE ANGULAR POSITION OF THE SHAFT

Einstweilige MaßnahmenEinstweilige MaßnahmenDusseldorf LDProvisional measuresCase Closed

Dieser Fall zitiert

In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
8.5	jurisdiction — rebuttable presumption of entitlement from patent register	Bindend	if the patent proprietor is registered in the European Patent Register or in the national register(s), it may initially rely on a rebuttable presumption (R. 8.5 (c) RoP).
211.4	urgency — unreasonable delay in applying for provisional measures	Bindend	Whether a delay is unreasonable within the meaning of R. 211.4 RoP depends on the circumstances of the individual case.
354.3	jurisdiction — penalty payments procedure	Bindend	These penalties will be determined by the Local Division in Düsseldorf upon request by the Applicant (Art. 63(2) UPCA; R. 354.3 RoP).
353	claim construction — rectification of obvious slips in orders	Bindend	According to R. 353 RoP, the Court may upon an application by a party made within one month of service of the decision or order, rectify clerical mistakes, errors in calculation and obvious slips in the decision or order.
9.1	jurisdiction — review of allocation of technically qualified judge	Bindend	MAGNA entities – referring to R. 9(1) RoP – request for a review of the allocation of a technically qualified judge and to allocate a technically qualified judge with experience in the field of mechanical engineering.

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
63(2)	jurisdiction — penalty payments for non-compliance with orders	Bindend	These penalties will be determined by the Local Division in Düsseldorf upon request by the Applicant (Art. 63(2) UPCA; R. 354.3 RoP).
73(2)(a)	jurisdiction — 15-day appeal period from PI order	Hintergrund	The Applicant and the Defendants may bring an appeal against the present order within 15 days of service of this order (Art. 73(2)(a), 62 UPCA, R. 220.1(c), 224.2(b) RoP).
62	jurisdiction — provisional measures	Hintergrund	The Applicant and the Defendants may bring an appeal against the present order within 15 days of service of this order (Art. 73(2)(a), 62 UPCA, R. 220.1(c), 224.2(b) RoP).

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
UPC_CFI_177/2023	claim construction — definition of obvious slip for rectification purposes	Bindend	"Obvious slips" within the meaning of R. 353 RoP are all incorrect or incomplete statements of what the Court actually intended in the order or decision ... (UPC_CFI_177/2023, Order dated 30 June 2023, under II.1. – myStromer/Revolt Zycling).

Zitiert in

Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Zitiert in	Datum	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
UPC_CFI_541/2024 Mannheim LD	20. Dez. 2024	security for costs — security as compensation for provisional assessment in PI proceedings	Überzeugend	vgl. Lokalkammer Düsseldorf, Order vom 31.10.2024, UPC_CFI_368/2024, V.4 (S. 38)
UPC_CFI_541/2024 Mannheim LD	20. Dez. 2024	security for costs — no costs-in-principle decision upon successful PI application	Überzeugend	Der Spruchkörper schließt sich insoweit der Auffassung der Lokalkammer Düsseldorf (Order vom 31.10.2024, UPC_CFI_368/2024, V.5 (S. 39)) an.