UPC CFI 421/2024
19. Juli 2024·EP2286325 · CARD METAPHOR FOR ACTIVITIES IN A COMPUTING DEVICE
- Verfahrensdetails
- StatusCase Closed (Vergleich)VerfahrensartVerletzungKategorieHauptverletzungsklage
- Parteien
- Beklagte
- Shenzhen Transsion Holdings Co, LtdUnternehmen
- TECNO MOBILE LIMITEDUnternehmen
- INFINIX MOBILITY LIMITEDUnternehmen
- Tekpoint GmbHUnternehmen
- Galaxus Deutschland GmbHUnternehmen
- Max ICT B.V.Unternehmen
Vertreter- Steffen Elmar Steininger-Hogan Lovells International LLP
- Jestaedt-Krieger Mes & Graf von der Groeben
- Division
- Munich LD
- Technologie
- Electrical engineeringComputer technology
- Sprache
- English
| Verletzung festgestellt | Median Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung | |
|---|---|---|
| Gesamt-UPC | 53% (62/117) | 124 |
| Munich LD | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
| Richter Daniel Voss | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
| Richter Georg Werner | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
| Richter András Kupecz | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
Vor dem UPC: Qualcomm Group (28 Verfahren)·Transsion Group (31 Verfahren)
- 2025-01-28Application RoP 265Öffentlich
Zusammenfassung: Decision from Munich Local Division dated 28 January 2025 permitting withdrawal of the patent infringement action filed by Qualcomm against Shenzhen Transsion Holdings and related entities. The withdrawal followed a settlement between Qualcomm and Defendant 1 (Transsion). The court allowed 60% reimbursement of court fees pursuant to R. 370.9(b)(i) RoP, as the withdrawal occurred before closure of the written procedure. Defendants 1–4 consented to withdrawal; Defendant 6 did not comment. No cost order was required.
Rechtsfragen anzeigen (2)
- Withdrawal of action under R. 265 RoP following settlement
- Court fee reimbursement under R. 370.9(b)(i) RoP
| Dokumenttitel | Datum | Öffentlich |
|---|---|---|
| Case Closure Formal Check | 2025-02-06 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Headnote-and-Keywords | 2025-01-29 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Outcome of the Order | 2025-01-29 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Withdrawal - Reimbursement | 2025-01-29 | Öffentlich |
| Consent Withdrawal Action | 2025-01-23 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Withdrawal action | 2025-01-17 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Receipt | 2025-01-17 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Application to withdraw the action - Qualcomm | 2025-01-17 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Outcome of the Order | 2024-12-03 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Withdrawal of a request of default decision | 2024-12-03 | Öffentlich |
Qualcomm Incorporated filed an infringement action at the Munich Local Division against Shenzhen Transsion Holdings and related entities for alleged infringement of EP 2 286 325 (card metaphor for computing activities). Following a settlement between Qualcomm and Transsion, Qualcomm withdrew the action; the court permitted the withdrawal, declared proceedings closed, ordered each party to bear its own costs per the settlement agreement, and awarded Qualcomm 60% reimbursement of court fees (EUR 18,600) as the withdrawal occurred before closure of the written procedure.
Settlement between Qualcomm and Defendant 1 (Transsion) provides valid basis for withdrawal of infringement action
KlägerRechtsgrundlage: R. 265.1 RoPHinweis: Defendants 1–4 consented; no legitimate interest asserted in having court decide the action.
60% court fee reimbursement applies where action withdrawn before closure of written procedure
KlägerRechtsgrundlage: R. 370.9(b)(i) RoPHinweis: Withdrawal occurred before closure of written procedure, triggering EUR 18,600 reimbursement (60% of fees paid).
Keine zurückgewiesenen Argumente erfasst.
Weitere Fälle zu diesem Grundsatz ansehen.