UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht: 13. Juni 2025

UPC_CFI_515/2025

LOGIC CIRCUITRY

Einstweilige MaßnahmenEinstweilige MaßnahmenDusseldorf LDProvisional measuresCase Closed
Dieser Fall zitiert
In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Verfahrensordnung · 6

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
206application for provisional measuresBindendSUBJECT: R. 206 RoP – Application for provisional measures
275.2alternative service / order of good serviceBindendPursuant to R. 275.2 RoP, on a reasoned request by the claimant, the Court may order that steps already taken to bring the statement of claim to the attention of the defendant by an alternative method or at an alternative place is good service.
209.1invitation to lodge an objection in PI proceedingsBindendmust apply all the more so for the Defendant's information about the application for provisional measures and its invitation to lodge an objection (R. 209.1(a) RoP; UPC_CFI_449/2025 (LD Düsseldorf), Order of 16 October 2025, mn. 12 – HP v Zhuhai).
270formal service methods exhaustedHintergrundthe Düsseldorf Local Division has exhausted all available means of formal service which are provided by Rules 270 to 274 RoP.
206application for provisional measuresBindendSUBJECT: R. 206 RoP – Application for provisional measures
275.2order of good service / alternative serviceBindendsteps already taken to bring the application for provisional measures in UPC_CFI_515/2025 to the attention of Defendant 2. constitute good service pursuant to R. 275.2 RoP

UPC (Erstinstanz) · 2

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
UPC_CFI_449/2025alternative service applicable to PI proceedingsBindendmust apply all the more so for the Defendant's information about the application for provisional measures and its invitation to lodge an objection (R. 209.1(a) RoP; UPC_CFI_449/2025 (LD Düsseldorf), Order of 16 October 2025, mn. 12 – HP v Zhuhai).
UPC_CFI_449/2025good service under R. 275.2 RoP where Chinese authorities failed to serveBindendit is justified to consider the steps taken so far as proper service in accordance with R. 275.2 RoP (continuation of UPC_CFI_449/2025 (LD Düsseldorf), Order of 16 October 2025, mn. 24 – HP v Zhuhai; with regard to the refusal of service due to f
Zitiert in
Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.