UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC CFI 864/2025

EP3402420 · AUTOGRAFTING TOOL WITH ENHANCED FLUTE PROFILE AND METHODS OF USE

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Case Closed (Patent wie erteilt aufrechterhalten)
Verfahrensart
Widerklage auf Nichtigkeit
Kategorie
Widerklage auf Nichtigkeit
Division
Dusseldorf LD
Richter
—
Technologie
  • Instruments
    Medical technology
  • Mechanical engineering
    Machine tools
Sprache
German
Erste Entscheidung
25. Aug. 2026
Im Vergleich
Die Bilanz des Gerichts für diese Art von Verfahren, gezählt in erstinstanzlichen Entscheidungen. Eine Zahl in Klammern gibt an, auf wie vielen Entscheidungen eine Quote beruht.
Patent nichtigMedian Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung
Gesamt-UPC36% (45/125)146
Dusseldorf LDGesperrtGesperrt

Vor dem UPC: HaeNaem Co., Ltd. (4 Verfahren)·Versah LLC (5 Verfahren)

Entscheidungen
  • 2026-08-25
    InfringementÖffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: The Local Division Düsseldorf (Panel 1) found that HaeNaem Co., Ltd. and Adin Dental Implant Systems Ltd. infringed claim 1 (and, via dependency, claim 11) of EP 3 402 420 B1 by importing and placing the accused rotary dental osteotomes on the market in Germany. The court ordered the defendants to cease and desist across nine UPC member states (Germany, Austria, Denmark, Italy, Belgium, Finland, France, the Netherlands and Sweden), to recall the infringing products from commercial distributees, and to render information and accounts, and declared them liable in principle for damages incurred since 1 August 2020. The revocation counterclaim (UPC_CFI_864/2025), raising added matter, insufficiency, and lack of novelty and inventive step over WO2014/077920 A1 and WO2015/138842 A1, was examined on the merits and rejected as unfounded, so the patent is maintained as granted.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (7)
    • Direct infringement of a product claim: whether the challenged embodiment is objectively capable, given its nature and suitability for use, of fulfilling the claim features
    • Standing to sue (Aktivlegitimation) of an exclusive (sub-)licensee under Art. 47(2) UPCA
    • Added matter under Art. 138(1)(c) EPC
    • Insufficiency of disclosure under Art. 138(1)(b) EPC
    • Novelty of claims 1 and 11 over WO2014/077920 A1 and WO2015/138842 A1
    • Inventive step of claim 1 in light of the 'negative rake angle' feature
    • Jurisdiction deemed accepted under R. 19.7 RoP absent a preliminary objection under R. 19
Dokumente
  • 931e8dc8-45d9-4cff-b7a1-fcfb7eb36088.pdf2026-08-25DE