UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 153/2025

Feb 24, 2025·EP2839083 · PILE SHOE

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Appeal
Category
Main appeal
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
  • Other fields
    Civil engineering
Language
German
First decided
Jul 3, 2025
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Judge Ingeborg SimonssonLocked

At the UPC: Tiroler Rohre GmbH (7 cases)·SSAB Swedish Steel GmbH (7 cases)

Decisions
  • 2025-07-03
    Application to leave to appeal a cost decision (RoP221)Public

    Summary: The Court of Appeal dismissed Tiroler Rohre's appeal against the Munich Local Division's cost order following withdrawal of its application for provisional measures. The Court held that the ordinary cost rules (R. 150 et seq. RoP) apply to cost decisions following withdrawal under R. 265 RoP; no special rule applies requiring reference to the panel rather than the standing judge. The legal review on appeal is limited to a marginal review of whether costs awarded are reasonable and proportionate (Art. 69(1) UPCA). The judge-rapporteur's detailed cost assessment showed no such deviation.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Costs following withdrawal of provisional measures application (R. 265 RoP; R. 150 RoP)
    • Leave to appeal a cost decision (R. 221 RoP)
    • Standard of review for cost decisions on appeal
Document titleDatePublic
Case Closure Formal Check2025-07-22Not public
Application-For-Costs-Decision-Outcome2025-07-08Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2025-07-08Not public
Anordnung2025-07-03Public
Zustimmung2025-04-14Not public
Comment pursuant to RoP 2642025-04-11Not public
Comment pursuant to RoP 2642025-04-11Not public
Stellungnahme2025-04-10Not public
Receipt2025-04-03Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2025-04-03Not public