Overview · Filed: Feb 24, 2025
UPC_CoA_153/2025
PILE SHOE
AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealGenericCase Closed
Parties
Claimants
- Tiroler Rohre GmbH
Reps: Christian Meyer (Maiwald)
Respondents
- SSAB Swedish Steel GmbH
- SSAB Europe Oy
Reps: Florian Robl (Torggler Hofmann)
Judges
- Ingeborg Simonsson
Patents
- EP 2 839 083
CPC codes: E02D5/665, E02D5/38, E02D5/72
Outcome
Costs only
Filed: Feb 24, 2025
First decided: —
Language: German
The Court of Appeal dismissed Tiroler Rohre's appeal against the Munich Local Division's cost order following withdrawal of its application for provisional measures. The Court held that the ordinary cost rules (R. 150 et seq. RoP) apply to cost decisions following withdrawal under R. 265 RoP; no special rule applies requiring reference to the panel rather than the standing judge. The legal review on appeal is limited to a marginal review of whether costs awarded are reasonable and proportionate (Art. 69(1) UPCA). The judge-rapporteur's detailed cost assessment showed no such deviation.
Open on UPC Registry