UPC_CoA_264/2024

BerufungenHauptberufungCourt of AppealAppealCase Closed

Dieser Fall zitiert

In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
RoP_rule 361	preliminary objection; action manifestly lacking foundation in law	Bindend	Proceedings under R.361 RoP should not result in a full exchange of arguments and evidence, but – as is clear from the use of the word 'manifestly' – must be reserved for clear-cut cases.
RoP_rule 285	UPC representative not required to submit written mandate unless court orders	Bindend	as follows from R.285 RoP, a UPC representative acting for a party before the Unified Patent Court is not required to submit a written mandate or a power of attorney
RoP_rule 29	front-loaded system; further substantiation of arguments permissible in reply	Bindend	the claimant, after having made an argument in its Statement of claim, further substantiates this argument in its Statement under R.29(a) or (b) RoP, in reply to a defence

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
Art. 48 UPCA	representation by registered UPC representative	Bindend	The withdrawal of an opt-out may be lodged either (i) by a registered UPC representative according to Art. 48 UPCA, or (ii) by any other person authorized with a mandate.

Zitiert in

Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.