UPC CoA 30/2024
EP1740740 · COMPACT SERVICE MODULE WHICH IS INTENDED FOR ELECTROLYTIC ALUMINIUM PRODUCTION PLANTS
- Verfahrensdetails
- Status—VerfahrensartBerufungKategorieHauptberufung
- Parteien
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Technologie
- ChemistrySurface technology, coating
- Sprache
- —
- Erste Entscheidung
- 16. Jan. 2025
| Median Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung | |
|---|---|
| Gesamt-UPC | 124 |
| Richter Rian Kalden | Gesperrt |
| Richter Ingeborg Simonsson | Gesperrt |
| Richter Patricia Rombach | Gesperrt |
Vor dem UPC: Fives ECL, SAS (5 Verfahren)·REEL GmbH (4 Verfahren)
Dieser Streit umfasst 3 weitere Verfahren
UPC CoA 42/2026·no order number559935/2023 - application processed in hardcopy only (outside CMS)·UPC CFI 274/2023
1 weitere Beklagte zum selben oder einem verwandten Patent
Starten Sie die kostenlose Testphase, um die Ausgänge zu sehen.
Weitere Verfahren: Court of Appeal·2024
- 2025-01-16Appeal RoP220.1Öffentlich
Zusammenfassung: Court of Appeal dismissed REEL GmbH's preliminary objection to the jurisdiction of the UPC in a damages determination action brought by Fives ECL, SAS (UPC_CFI_274/2023). The CoA held that the UPC has jurisdiction under Art. 32(1)(a) and 32(1)(f) UPCA to determine damages following a national court judgment establishing infringement of EP 1 740 740. The separate action for damages is not limited to 'applications' under the Rules but constitutes an autonomous action; the court's competence also covers acts of infringement committed before the UPCA entry into force, provided the patent had not lapsed by 1 June 2023.
Rechtsfragen anzeigen (4)
- UPC jurisdiction over damages-only action following national court infringement judgment
- Art. 32(1)(a) and (f) UPCA: separate action for damages
- Temporal jurisdiction over acts committed before UPCA entry into force
- Preliminary objection to jurisdiction under Rule 19.1 RoP
- EN%20Final%20order%204000%202024%20%281%29.pdf2025-01-16EN
- Final%20order%204000%202024%20signed.pdf2025-01-16DE