UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC CoA 30/2024

EP1740740 · COMPACT SERVICE MODULE WHICH IS INTENDED FOR ELECTROLYTIC ALUMINIUM PRODUCTION PLANTS

Verfahrensdetails
Status
—
Verfahrensart
Berufung
Kategorie
Hauptberufung
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter
Beklagte
Vertreter
Division
Court of Appeal
Technologie
  • Chemistry
    Surface technology, coating
Sprache
—
Erste Entscheidung
16. Jan. 2025
Im Vergleich
Wie lange das Gericht bis zu einer ersten Entscheidung braucht.
Median Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung
Gesamt-UPC124
Richter Rian KaldenGesperrt
Richter Ingeborg SimonssonGesperrt
Richter Patricia RombachGesperrt

Vor dem UPC: Fives ECL, SAS (5 Verfahren)·REEL GmbH (4 Verfahren)

Entscheidungen
  • 2025-01-16
    Appeal RoP220.1Öffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: Court of Appeal dismissed REEL GmbH's preliminary objection to the jurisdiction of the UPC in a damages determination action brought by Fives ECL, SAS (UPC_CFI_274/2023). The CoA held that the UPC has jurisdiction under Art. 32(1)(a) and 32(1)(f) UPCA to determine damages following a national court judgment establishing infringement of EP 1 740 740. The separate action for damages is not limited to 'applications' under the Rules but constitutes an autonomous action; the court's competence also covers acts of infringement committed before the UPCA entry into force, provided the patent had not lapsed by 1 June 2023.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (4)
    • UPC jurisdiction over damages-only action following national court infringement judgment
    • Art. 32(1)(a) and (f) UPCA: separate action for damages
    • Temporal jurisdiction over acts committed before UPCA entry into force
    • Preliminary objection to jurisdiction under Rule 19.1 RoP
Dokumente
  • EN%20Final%20order%204000%202024%20%281%29.pdf2025-01-16EN
  • Final%20order%204000%202024%20signed.pdf2025-01-16DE