UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht: 27. Feb. 2026

UPC_CoA_37/2026

METHOD TO MODIFY ALIGNER BY MODIFYING TOOTH POSITION

BerufungenHauptberufungCourt of AppealAppealCase Closed
Dieser Fall zitiert
In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Verfahrensordnung · 4

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
220.3jurisdictionBindendrequest for a discretionary review (R. 220.3 RoP), Re-establishment of rights (R. 320 RoP), Time extension (R. 9.3 (a) RoP)
320jurisdictionBindendRe-establishment of rights (R. 320 RoP), Time extension (R. 9.3 (a) RoP)
9.3(a)urgencyBindendAccording to R. 9.3 (a) RoP, on a reasoned request by a party the Court may extend, even retrospectively, a time period referred to in the Rules of Procedure
9.1jurisdictionBindendthe regulatory content of R. 9.1 RoP must be considered. According to this provision, the Court may, on its own motion or upon request, at any stage of the proceedings

UPC (Erstinstanz) · 1

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
UPC_CFI_1747/2025urgencyHintergrundProcedural Order of 26 February 2026 issued by the Local Division Düsseldorf. Reference numbers: UPC_CFI_1747/2025
Zitiert in
Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.