UPC CoA 456/2024

Vor dem UPC: OrthoApnea S.L. (7 Verfahren)

• 2024-11-21
  Appeal RoP220.2Öffentlich

  Zusammenfassung: Court of Appeal declared the appeal against the primary first-instance order inadmissible and rejected the appeal against the review order. The CoA clarified the rules on amendment of a case versus new arguments: not every new argument constitutes an amendment of case requiring leave under R.263 RoP; the nature or scope of the dispute must change. The anonymised respondent's claims relating to admissibility of new arguments were assessed. The case involves a patent infringement action before a Dutch-language division.

  Rechtsfragen anzeigen (4)

  • Amendment of case versus new argument (R.263 RoP)
  • Admissibility of new arguments after Statement of Claim
  • Leave to appeal (R.220.2 RoP)
  • Inadmissibility of appeal against primary order